Kumar K, Daniel J, Doig K, Agamanolis D
Department of Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.
Hum Pathol. 1998 Jul;29(7):750-5. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90286-6.
A variety of pressures to change curriculum have resulted in revision of pathology teaching in most medical schools in the United States. Responses obtained from 71% of schools on a recent survey of pathology teaching indicate the following: There are wide variations in the extent of use of various teaching modalities with resulting emergence of different teaching formats which can be categorized as "traditional," "enhanced traditional," predominantly "problem based" or "case oriented," entirely "problem based," or some form of "hybrid" of traditional and problem based. The traditional lecture and laboratory continue to be the primary modes of teaching in the vast majority (74%) of schools, however, 53% also use other approaches, eg, small group discussion, case studies, or conferences to enhance instruction. The lecture remains an important component of instruction in all major models. The form and extent of the laboratory use varies remarkably from minimal to large number of hours of instruction. The laboratory material is incorporated into small group discussion or conferences in many schools. The use of small group discussions (presently, by 79% of schools) has increased since the last survey conducted in 1986. The mean curricular time (presently 188 hours) has dropped, however, it is not easy to quantify pathology teaching in many schools with increasing integration. Instruction is entirely integrated, multidisciplinary in 28% of schools. Computer-aided instruction is used in some form to varying extents in 66% of schools, with the majority using it as a supplementary tool. There are persistent concerns about faculty time, and high student-faculty ratio.
在美国,多种课程变革压力导致多数医学院校的病理学教学进行了修订。近期一项针对病理学教学的调查从71%的院校获得了反馈,结果如下:各种教学方式的使用程度差异很大,由此产生了不同的教学形式,可归类为“传统型”、“强化传统型”、主要“基于问题型”或“案例导向型”、完全“基于问题型”,或传统与基于问题型的某种“混合”形式。传统讲座和实验室教学仍然是绝大多数(74%)院校的主要教学模式,然而,53%的院校也采用其他方法,如小组讨论、案例研究或研讨会来加强教学。讲座在所有主要教学模式中仍然是教学的重要组成部分。实验室使用的形式和程度差异显著,从最少到大量教学时间不等。在许多院校,实验室内容被纳入小组讨论或研讨会中。自1986年上次调查以来,小组讨论的使用(目前79%的院校采用)有所增加。课程平均时间(目前为188小时)有所下降,然而,随着整合度的提高,许多院校的病理学教学难以量化。28%的院校教学完全整合、多学科化。66%的院校以某种形式不同程度地使用计算机辅助教学,大多数院校将其作为辅助工具。人们一直关注教师时间和高师生比问题。