Suppr超能文献

利用健康犬的地面反作用力评估肢体对称指数。

Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs.

作者信息

Budsberg S C, Jevens D J, Brown J, Foutz T L, DeCamp C E, Reece L

机构信息

Department of Small animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 1993 Oct;54(10):1569-74.

PMID:8250378
Abstract

Limb symmetry was evaluated by measuring ground reaction forces in 2 groups of normal-gaited dogs at a trot. Data were collected from 2 groups of 21 dogs trotted at dog/handler velocities of 1.25 to 1.55 m/s and 1.85 to 2.05 m/s, respectively. Of these dogs, 9 participated in both groups to allow comparison of data at both velocities. Additionally, 16 of the dogs in group 1 were measured in 2 directions of movement to determine whether directional dependence was present. Collected data were then applied to 3 described symmetry indices. Each index was easy to calculate, but all had limitations. A major limitation was variation in magnitude of ground reaction forces measured between the different axes and the effect of this variation on precision of the derived indices. Vertical ground forces provided the most consistent symmetry indices, in part because of their large magnitude. The indices indicated that no dog had perfect right-to-left symmetry during a trotting gait. Statistical differences were not found in any of the measurements of directional dependence. Likewise, comparing symmetry data in dogs trotted at both velocities indicated no significant differences in any axis. However, further analysis of the data revealed the actual amount that a variance attributable to right-left limb variation was negligible. Most of the variance was attributable to trial variation. Thus, the aforementioned indices, which use nonconsecutive footfall methods to evaluate limb symmetry, actually measure principally trial variation and not limb-to-limb variation.

摘要

通过测量两组正常步态的犬在小跑时的地面反作用力来评估肢体对称性。分别从两组各21只犬收集数据,犬/训导员的速度分别为1.25至1.55米/秒和1.85至2.05米/秒。这些犬中,有9只参与了两组实验,以便比较两个速度下的数据。此外,对第一组中的16只犬在两个运动方向上进行了测量,以确定是否存在方向依赖性。然后将收集到的数据应用于3种已描述的对称性指标。每个指标都易于计算,但都有局限性。一个主要局限性是不同轴之间测量的地面反作用力大小的变化以及这种变化对导出指标精度的影响。垂直地面力提供了最一致的对称性指标,部分原因是其大小较大。这些指标表明,在小跑步态期间,没有一只犬具有完美的左右对称性。在任何方向依赖性测量中均未发现统计学差异。同样,比较以两种速度小跑的犬的对称性数据表明,在任何轴上均无显著差异。然而,对数据的进一步分析表明,可归因于左右肢体差异的方差实际量可以忽略不计。大部分方差归因于试验变化。因此,上述使用非连续落足方法评估肢体对称性的指标,实际上主要测量的是试验变化而非肢体间变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验