Middleton W, Moylan A, Raphael B, Burnett P, Martinek N
Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;27(3):457-63. doi: 10.3109/00048679309075803.
This paper reports on part of a study which was aimed at assessing the views of leading researchers, theorists or clinicians working in the field of bereavement on key issues including, as reported here, concepts of different forms of grief as well as favoured theoretical orientations. Of a range of conceptual models the most favoured, by a large margin, were attachment theory and the psychodynamic model. The views of the "experts" were canvassed with respect to the use of seven selected terms used to denote some variant of the grieving process. There was, on the part of the respondents, reasonable support for the syndromes of "delayed", "chronic", "anticipatory" and "absent" grief. "Inhibited" and "unresolved" grief tended to be described using one of the four terms already supported, while the use of the term "distorted grief" attracted little support.
本文报告了一项研究的部分内容，该研究旨在评估丧亲之痛领域的顶尖研究人员、理论家或临床医生对关键问题的看法，如本文所报道的，包括不同形式悲伤的概念以及偏好的理论取向。在一系列概念模型中，最受青睐的是依恋理论和心理动力模型，这两者远远领先于其他模型。就用于表示悲伤过程某种变体的七个选定术语的使用问题，征求了“专家”的意见。受访者对“延迟性”“慢性”“预期性”和“无悲伤反应”悲伤综合征给予了合理支持。“抑制性”和“未解决性”悲伤倾向于用已获支持的四个术语之一来描述，而“扭曲性悲伤”这一术语几乎未获支持。
