Bonanno G A, Kaltman S
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of America, USA.
Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):760-76. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.760.
For nearly a century, bereavement theorists have assumed that recovery from loss requires a period of grief work in which the ultimate goal is the severing of the attachment bond to the deceased. Reviews appearing in the 1980s noted a surprising absence of empirical support for this view, thus leaving the bereavement field without a guiding theoretical base. In this article, the authors consider alternative perspectives on bereavement that are based on cognitive stress theory, attachment theory, the social-functional account of emotion, and trauma theory. They then elaborate on the most promising features of each theory in an attempt to develop an integrative framework to guide future research. The authors elucidate 4 fundamental components of the grieving process--context, meaning, representations of the lost relationship, and coping and emotion-regulation processes--and suggest ways in which these components may interact over the course of bereavement.
近一个世纪以来,丧亲之痛理论学家一直认为,从丧失中恢复需要一段悲伤处理期,其最终目标是切断与逝者的情感纽带。20世纪80年代出现的综述指出,这一观点惊人地缺乏实证支持,从而使丧亲之痛领域没有一个指导性的理论基础。在本文中,作者们探讨了基于认知应激理论、依恋理论、情感的社会功能解释和创伤理论的丧亲之痛的不同观点。然后,他们详细阐述了每种理论最有前景的特征,试图构建一个综合框架来指导未来的研究。作者们阐明了悲伤过程的四个基本组成部分——情境、意义、对失去关系的表征,以及应对和情绪调节过程——并提出了这些组成部分在丧亲过程中可能相互作用的方式。