Grant D J, McMurdo M E, Mole P A, Paterson C R, Davies R R
University of Dundee, Department of Ageing and Health, Medical School, UK.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993 Nov;39(5):529-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1993.tb02404.x.
Recent studies have suggested that patients receiving thyroxine are at increased risk of osteoporosis. We set out to measure bone mineral densities in two groups of post-menopausal women receiving thyroxine replacement therapy (those with serum TSH levels persistently suppressed or non-suppressed) and to compare the results in both groups with those of the local control population.
Cross-sectional study.
Seventy-eight post-menopausal women who had been treated with thyroxine for primary autoimmune or idiopathic hypothyroidism for a minimum of 5 years, 44 with TSH persistently suppressed and 34 non-suppressed. One hundred and two control subjects.
Forearm bone mineral density at proximal and distal sites as measured by single-photon absorptiometry.
Results were expressed as Z-scores, i.e. number of standard deviations from the mean of a 5-year age-band from the local control population. Mean Z-scores at proximal and distal sites for the non-suppressed patients were -0.03 and -0.07 and for the suppressed patients were -0.20 and -0.25, representing a decrease in bone mineral density of at most 5% in the suppressed patients. The differences between the three groups were not statistically significant.
In this patient population, the reduction in bone mineral density due to thyroxine is small. It is unlikely to be of clinical significance and should not on its own be an indication for reduction of thyroxine dose in patients who are clinically euthyroid.
近期研究表明,接受甲状腺素治疗的患者患骨质疏松症的风险增加。我们着手测量两组接受甲状腺素替代治疗的绝经后女性(血清促甲状腺激素水平持续被抑制或未被抑制者)的骨密度,并将两组结果与当地对照人群的结果进行比较。
横断面研究。
78名因原发性自身免疫性或特发性甲状腺功能减退接受甲状腺素治疗至少5年的绝经后女性,其中44名促甲状腺激素水平持续被抑制,34名未被抑制。102名对照者。
采用单光子吸收法测量前臂近端和远端部位的骨密度。
结果以Z值表示,即与当地对照人群5岁年龄组平均值的标准差数。未被抑制患者近端和远端部位的平均Z值分别为-0.03和-0.07,被抑制患者的平均Z值分别为-0.20和-0.25,这表明被抑制患者的骨密度最多降低了5%。三组之间的差异无统计学意义。
在该患者群体中,甲状腺素导致的骨密度降低幅度较小。其临床意义不大,对于临床甲状腺功能正常的患者,不应仅因其自身原因而成为降低甲状腺素剂量的指征。