Suppr超能文献

亚临床强迫性检查者的记忆。

Memory in sub-clinical obsessive-compulsive checkers.

作者信息

Rubenstein C S, Peynircioglu Z F, Chambless D L, Pigott T A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC 20016-8062.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 1993 Nov;31(8):759-65. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90006-g.

Abstract

In a series of experiments we extended the research on possible memory deficits in subclinical obsessive-compulsive Ss who reported excessive checking. Using a variety of memory tests we compared 20 subclinical checkers to 20 Ss without obsessive-compulsive symptomatology. Contrary to hypothesis, checkers remembered self-generated words better than read words just as much as did normals, but they were more likely than normals to report thinking they had studied words that, in fact, had not been on the study list. Further, they more often confused whether they read or generated the words at study. Checkers did not appear to perseverate on already-recalled words on repeated free recall tests any more than did normals. However, checkers remembered fewer actions overall and more often misremembered whether they had performed, observed, or written these actions. Such memory deficits may contribute to the development of excessive checking.

摘要

在一系列实验中,我们拓展了对报告有过度检查行为的亚临床强迫症患者可能存在的记忆缺陷的研究。我们使用了多种记忆测试,将20名亚临床检查者与20名无强迫症状的受试者进行了比较。与假设相反,检查者对自己生成的单词的记忆比对阅读单词的记忆更好,程度与正常人相同,但他们比正常人更有可能报告认为自己学习过实际上并未在学习列表中的单词。此外,他们更常混淆在学习时是阅读还是生成了这些单词。在重复的自由回忆测试中,检查者在已经回忆过的单词上并没有比正常人表现出更多的持续重复。然而,检查者总体上记住的动作较少,并且更常记错自己是否执行、观察或写下了这些动作。这种记忆缺陷可能导致过度检查行为的发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验