Harkin Ben, Rutherford Hannah, Kessler Klaus
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK.
Front Psychol. 2011 May 3;2:78. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00078. eCollection 2011.
We previously showed that working memory (WM) performance of subclinical checkers can be affected if they are presented with irrelevant but misleading information during the retention period (Harkin and Kessler, 2009, 2011). The present study differed from our previous research in the three crucial aspects. Firstly, we employed ecologically valid stimuli in form of electrical kitchen appliances on a kitchen countertop in order to address previous criticism of our research with letters in locations as these may not have tapped into the primary concerns of checkers. Secondly, we tested whether these ecological stimuli would allow us to employ a simpler (un-blocked) design while obtaining similarly robust results. Thirdly, in Experiment 2 we improved the measure of confidence as a metacognitive variable by using a quantitative scale (0-100), which indeed revealed more robust effects that were quantitatively related to accuracy of performance. The task in the present study was to memorize four appliances, including their states (on/off), and their locations on the kitchen countertop. Memory accuracy was tested for the states of appliances in Experiment 1, and for their locations in Experiment 2. Intermediate probes were identical in both experiments and were administered during retention on 66.7% of the trials with 50% resolvable and 50% irresolvable/misleading probes. Experiment 1 revealed the efficacy of the employed stimuli by revealing a general impairment of high- compared to low checkers, which confirmed the ecological validity of our stimuli. In Experiment 2 we observed the expected, more differentiated pattern: High checkers were not generally affected in their WM performance (i.e., no general capacity issue); instead they showed a particular impairment in the misleading distractor-probe condition. Also, high checkers' confidence ratings were indicative of a general impairment in metacognitive functioning. We discuss how specific executive dysfunction and general metacognitive impairment may affect memory traces in the short- and in the long-term.
我们之前的研究表明,如果在保持期内向亚临床检查者呈现无关但具有误导性的信息,他们的工作记忆(WM)表现可能会受到影响(哈金和凯斯勒,2009年,2011年)。本研究在三个关键方面与我们之前的研究有所不同。首先,我们采用了生态有效刺激,形式为厨房台面上的电器,以回应之前对我们以字母在位置上进行研究的批评,因为这些可能没有触及检查者的主要关注点。其次,我们测试了这些生态刺激是否能让我们采用更简单(无阻碍)的设计,同时获得同样可靠的结果。第三,在实验2中,我们通过使用定量量表(0 - 100)改进了作为元认知变量的信心测量方法,这确实揭示了与表现准确性在数量上相关的更可靠的效应。本研究中的任务是记住四个电器,包括它们的状态(开/关)以及它们在厨房台面上的位置。在实验1中测试了电器状态的记忆准确性,在实验2中测试了它们位置的记忆准确性。两个实验中的中间探测相同,在保持期内对66.7%的试验进行探测,其中50%的探测是可解决的,50%是不可解决/具有误导性的探测。实验1通过揭示与低检查者相比高检查者普遍受损,揭示了所采用刺激的有效性,这证实了我们刺激的生态有效性。在实验2中,我们观察到了预期的、更具区分性的模式:高检查者的工作记忆表现一般不受影响(即不存在一般能力问题);相反,他们在具有误导性的干扰探测条件下表现出特定的受损。此外,高检查者的信心评级表明元认知功能普遍受损。我们讨论了特定的执行功能障碍和一般的元认知损伤如何可能在短期和长期内影响记忆痕迹。