Hunkin N M, Parkin A J
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex.
Cortex. 1993 Sep;29(3):485-99. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80255-9.
This study further examines the performance of diencephalic and temporal lobe amnesics on the recency judgement task (Parkin, Leng and Hunkin, 1990). The two patient groups were represented by patients with Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS) and post-Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). Experiment 1 demonstrated that poorer recency judgements by WKS patients were not due to a general proactive interference effect, but from an inability to remember which items had been designated targets on a given trial. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the superior performance of the HSE group was not attributable to a putative faster forgetting rate. In addition, the study found no relationship between recency judgements and degree of frontal lobe impairment. It is concluded that diencephalic damage has a particular effect on the ability to make recency judgements and that this represents a fundamental difference between diencephalic and temporal lobe amnesia. Theoretical interpretations of this difference are discussed.
本研究进一步考察了间脑和颞叶失忆症患者在近因判断任务中的表现(帕金、伦格和亨金,1990年)。两个患者组分别由韦尼克 - 科尔萨科夫综合征(WKS)患者和单纯疱疹病毒性脑炎(HSE)后患者代表。实验1表明,WKS患者较差的近因判断并非由于一般的前摄干扰效应,而是因为无法记住在给定试验中哪些项目被指定为目标。实验2表明,HSE组的优越表现并非归因于假定的更快遗忘率。此外,该研究发现近因判断与额叶损伤程度之间没有关系。得出的结论是,间脑损伤对做出近因判断的能力有特定影响,这代表了间脑和颞叶失忆症之间的根本差异。讨论了对这种差异的理论解释。