Suppr超能文献

老年高血压患者使用赖诺普利后压力反射敏感性的改善不能仅用血压降低来解释。

Improved baroreflex sensitivity in elderly hypertensives on lisinopril is not explained by blood pressure reduction alone.

作者信息

Egan B M, Fleissner M J, Stepniakowski K, Neahring J M, Sagar K B, Ebert T J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1993 Oct;11(10):1113-20. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199310000-00016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The major goals of this study were to determine whether lisinopril and nifedipine lowered blood pressure and improved carotid baroreflexes in older hypertensives.

DESIGN

The effects of lisinopril at 10-40 mg/day versus nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) at 30-90 mg/day on blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity were studied after 3 weeks each on (1) single-blind placebo, (2) double-blind assignment to either lisinopril or nifedipine, (3) single-blind placebo, and (4) crossover to double-blind lisinopril or nifedipine. Measurements at the end of the four phases included 24-h blood pressure using the Accutracker, laboratory hemodynamics with the Dinamap and impedance cardiography, baroreflex sensitivity with the pneumatic neck chamber, and plasma samples for neurohumoral and metabolic activity.

PATIENTS

Thirteen patients aged 55 years or older (mean +/- SEM 65 +/- 1 years) with mild-to-moderate hypertension completed the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary data for analysis across the four study phases included ambulatory blood pressure values, laboratory hemodynamics, and baroreflex sensitivity.

RESULTS

Compared with the preceding placebo, lisinopril and nifedipine lowered 24-h blood pressure significantly. In the laboratory, the effects of both compounds on blood pressure, cardiac output, calculated total systemic resistance, and the stroke volume-pulse pressure relationship, an index of arterial compliance, were similar. Lisinopril was associated with a relative increase in the standing systolic blood pressure compared with nifedipine (P < 0.05). This coincided with an enhanced heart-rate (R-R interval) response to neck pressure, which also decreased carotid transmural pressure, with lisinopril versus nifedipine (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lisinopril and nifedipine were both effective as monotherapy for controlling blood pressure in these elderly patients. Despite similar effects on blood pressure and systemic hemodynamics, baroreflex sensitivity in response to a reduction in carotid transmural pressure was greater with lisinopril than with nifedipine.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目标是确定赖诺普利和硝苯地平是否能降低老年高血压患者的血压并改善颈动脉压力反射。

设计

研究了每天10 - 40毫克的赖诺普利与每天30 - 90毫克的硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)对血压和压力反射敏感性的影响,研究分四个阶段,每个阶段为期3周,依次为:(1)单盲安慰剂阶段;(2)双盲分配至赖诺普利或硝苯地平阶段;(3)单盲安慰剂阶段;(4)交叉至双盲赖诺普利或硝苯地平阶段。四个阶段结束时的测量包括使用Accutracker测量24小时血压、使用Dinamap和阻抗心动图测量实验室血流动力学、使用气动颈部腔室测量压力反射敏感性,以及采集血浆样本以检测神经体液和代谢活性。

患者

13名年龄在55岁及以上(平均±标准误65±1岁)的轻度至中度高血压患者完成了本研究。

主要观察指标

四个研究阶段用于分析的主要数据包括动态血压值、实验室血流动力学和压力反射敏感性。

结果

与之前的安慰剂相比,赖诺普利和硝苯地平均显著降低了24小时血压。在实验室中,两种药物对血压、心输出量、计算得出的总全身阻力以及作为动脉顺应性指标的每搏量 - 脉压关系的影响相似。与硝苯地平相比,赖诺普利与站立位收缩压的相对升高有关(P < 0.05)。这与赖诺普利组对颈部压力的心率(R - R间期)反应增强同时出现,颈部压力也降低了颈动脉跨壁压,与硝苯地平组相比有差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

赖诺普利和硝苯地平作为单一疗法对控制这些老年患者的血压均有效。尽管对血压和全身血流动力学有相似影响,但赖诺普利对颈动脉跨壁压降低的压力反射敏感性高于硝苯地平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验