• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Gene-specific damage produced by cisplatin, ormaplatin and UV light in human cells as assayed by the polymerase chain reaction.

作者信息

Oshita F, Eastman A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Toxcicology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755-3835.

出版信息

Oncol Res. 1993;5(3):111-8.

PMID:8260747
Abstract

The level of DNA damage in the total genome of leukocytes from patients receiving cisplatin therapy has been previously correlated with therapeutic outcome. Based on the fact that unrepaired damage in transcribed genes has been well correlated with sensitivity to a number of DNA damaging agents, the correlations with therapeutic response might be improved if the level of DNA damage in specific genes was assessed. We previously established a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to measure cisplatin lesions in specific genes. The major advantages of this assay include its potential to quantify DNA lesions produced by any DNA damaging agent, and to measure it in minute samples of cells. This assay has been further improved to realize this potential. Specifically, cells were damaged with cisplatin, a related analogue ormaplatin, and ultraviolet light, and PCR was performed on the DNA from 1000 cells after direct lysis with no purification. Human HL-60 cells were used to compare the efficacy of the various agents to damage the alpha-fetoprotein gene. This was then extrapolated to damage in the total genome and compared to the cytotoxicity for each agent. At a dose that killed 50% of the cells, ormaplatin, cisplatin and ultraviolet light produced 19,200, 48,000, and 1,080,000 lesions per cell, demonstrating that ormaplatin lesions were the most effective at killing cells. Mononuclear cells were obtained from freshly isolated blood from five individuals. These cells were damaged with the three agents, and PCR of the alpha-fetoprotein gene was performed. No significant difference between the individuals was observed in the level of DNA damage produced by any of the agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
Gene-specific damage produced by cisplatin, ormaplatin and UV light in human cells as assayed by the polymerase chain reaction.
Oncol Res. 1993;5(3):111-8.
2
Detection of DNA damage in transcriptionally active genes by RT-PCR and assessment of repair of cisplatin-induced damage in the glutathione S-transferase-pi gene in human glioblastoma cells.通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测转录活性基因中的DNA损伤,并评估人胶质母细胞瘤细胞中谷胱甘肽S-转移酶-pi基因顺铂诱导损伤的修复情况。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1997 Mar;143(1):22-9. doi: 10.1006/taap.1996.8010.
3
A truncated human xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A protein expressed from an adenovirus sensitizes human tumor cells to ultraviolet light and cisplatin.由腺病毒表达的截短型人类着色性干皮病A互补组蛋白可使人类肿瘤细胞对紫外线和顺铂敏感。
Cancer Res. 2001 Jan 15;61(2):764-70.
4
DNA damage by anticancer agents and its repair: mapping in cells at the subgene level with quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Anal Biochem. 1994 Oct;222(1):236-42. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1479.
5
Nuclear and mitochondrial distribution of organoamidoplatinum(II) lesions in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant adenocarcinoma cells.顺铂敏感和耐药腺癌细胞中有机酰胺铂(II)损伤的细胞核和线粒体分布
Anticancer Drug Des. 2001 Apr-Jun;16(2-3):135-41.
6
Antitumor activity of a new platinum(II) complex with low nephrotoxicity and genotoxicity.一种具有低肾毒性和遗传毒性的新型铂(II)配合物的抗肿瘤活性
Chem Biol Interact. 2004 Jun 30;148(1-2):37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2004.04.002.
7
The interaction of DNA-targeted platinum phenanthridinium complexes with DNA in human cells.靶向DNA的铂菲啶鎓配合物与人细胞中DNA的相互作用。
Anticancer Drug Des. 2001 Apr-Jun;16(2-3):81-9.
8
Ormaplatin sensitivity/resistance in human ovarian cancer cells made resistant to cisplatin.对顺铂产生耐药性的人卵巢癌细胞中的奥马铂敏感性/耐药性
Cancer Res. 1993 Jan 15;53(2):242-7.
9
Analysis of 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine incorporation into cellular DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Anal Biochem. 1998 Aug 15;262(1):1-8. doi: 10.1006/abio.1998.2782.
10
Mutant Nbs1 enhances cisplatin-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity in head and neck cancer.突变型Nbs1增强顺铂诱导的头颈癌DNA损伤和细胞毒性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Oct;131(4):477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.04.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactions of Cisplatin and Daunorubicin at the Chromatin Level.顺铂与柔红霉素在染色质水平上的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 24;10(1):1107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57702-7.
2
Development and validation of a PCR-based assay for the selection of patients more likely to benefit from therapeutic treatment with alkylating drugs.开发和验证一种基于 PCR 的检测方法,以选择更有可能从烷基化药物治疗中获益的患者。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;74(5):842-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04274.x.
3
Quantification of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage and error rates by real-time QPCR.
通过实时定量聚合酶链反应对线粒体DNA(mtDNA)损伤和错误率进行定量分析。
Mitochondrion. 2009 Feb;9(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
4
Phenoxodiol protects against Cisplatin induced neurite toxicity in a PC-12 cell model.苯氧二醇在PC-12细胞模型中可预防顺铂诱导的神经突毒性。
BMC Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;8:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-61.
5
Rapid polymerase chain reaction assay to detect variation in the extent of gene-specific damage between cisplatin- or VP-16-resistant and sensitive lung cancer cell lines.采用快速聚合酶链反应分析法检测顺铂或依托泊苷耐药及敏感肺癌细胞系之间基因特异性损伤程度的差异。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1994 Jul;85(7):669-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1994.tb02412.x.
6
Detection of platinum-DNA adducts by 32P-postlabelling.用³²P后标记法检测铂-DNA加合物
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Apr 25;23(8):1300-6. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.8.1300.
7
Correlation of gene-specific damage with cisplatin between human adenocarcinoma cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-stop assay.通过聚合酶链反应终止法分析人腺癌细胞与外周血单个核细胞中基因特异性损伤与顺铂的相关性。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995 Feb;86(2):233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03044.x.