Mortola J P, Hemmings G, Matsuoka T, Saiki C, Fox G
Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993 Oct;16(4):248-53. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950160407.
We propose a method for measurements of respiratory system compliance (Crs) in spontaneously breathing infants, which circumvents the potential problems introduced by the breath-by-breath oscillations in the end-expiratory level, i.e., functional respiratory capacity (FRC). Changes in lung volume (V) and pressure at the airway opening (P(ao)) were measured in 10 infants breathing through a face mask. A first brief occlusion was to establish a reference V and the corresponding static P(ao); a second occlusion was done at a different V, within the same expiration, or in the following breath. Both occlusions were sufficiently long for the establishment of a stable P(ao) value. From the V difference (delta V, where delta V was at least 20% tidal volume) and the corresponding difference in P(ao) (delta P(ao)) Crs was computed and averaged (Crs[REF.VOL.] = delta V/delta P(ao). Although, on average, the results were similar to those obtained by the traditional multiple occlusions technique with linear regression analysis of the P(ao)-V data points (Crs[MOT]), in several infants Crs[REF.VOL.] tended to be slightly higher than Crs[MOT]. Some possibilities for this discrepancy are discussed. It seems likely that breath-to-breath oscillation in FRC may potentially lower Crs[MOT] by introducing a bias on the V measurement at low P(ao). We conclude that referencing V for Crs measurements in spontaneously breathing infants is a simple approach, which does not require linear regression analysis and circumvents the effects of oscillation in FRC.
我们提出了一种测量自主呼吸婴儿呼吸系统顺应性(Crs)的方法,该方法规避了呼气末水平即功能残气量(FRC)逐次呼吸振荡所带来的潜在问题。对10名通过面罩呼吸的婴儿测量了肺容积(V)和气道开口处压力(P(ao))的变化。第一次短暂阻塞用于建立参考V和相应的静态P(ao);第二次阻塞在相同呼气过程中的不同V值时进行,或在随后的呼吸中进行。两次阻塞时间都足够长,以建立稳定的P(ao)值。根据V的差值(δV,其中δV至少为潮气量的20%)和P(ao)的相应差值(δP(ao))计算并平均得出Crs(Crs[REF.VOL.] = δV/δP(ao))。尽管平均而言,结果与通过对P(ao)-V数据点进行线性回归分析的传统多次阻塞技术所得结果相似(Crs[MOT]),但在一些婴儿中,Crs[REF.VOL.]往往略高于Crs[MOT]。讨论了这种差异的一些可能原因。FRC的逐次呼吸振荡似乎可能通过在低P(ao)时对V测量引入偏差而潜在降低Crs[MOT]。我们得出结论,在自主呼吸婴儿中进行Crs测量时参考V是一种简单的方法,它不需要线性回归分析,并且规避了FRC振荡的影响。