Suppr超能文献

纤维支气管镜检查的局部鼻内麻醉:利多卡因喷雾还是凝胶?

Topical nasal anaesthesia for fibreoptic bronchoscopy: lignocaine spray or gel?

作者信息

Zainudin B M, Rafia M H, Sufarlan A W

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 1993 Apr;34(2):148-9.

PMID:8266157
Abstract

Lignocaine spray for anaesthetising the nasal mucosa for fibreoptic bronchoscopy often causes discomfort to the patient. We compared two techniques of applying nasal topical anaesthesia using either lignocaine spray (group A: 25 patients) or gel (group B: 30 patients) to assess patients' tolerance to the procedure. Both groups received 100 mg of lignocaine in the nostril, 40-50 mg to oropharynx, 120 mg to vocal cords and 40-100 mg to trachea and bronchi. Throat anaesthesia was the most common unpleasant part experienced by both groups of patients (34.5%), followed by examination of bronchi (30.6%) and nasal anaesthesia (21.8%). Significantly more patients in group A experienced discomfort or pain during nasal anaesthesia as compared to group B (p < 0.001). Patients' tolerance to the bronchoscopy was similar in both groups and the examination was performed satisfactorily in all patients. Thus, lignocaine gel is a simple technique, effective and less irritating as compared to lignocaine spray for topical nasal anaesthesia.

摘要

用于纤维支气管镜检查时麻醉鼻黏膜的利多卡因喷雾剂常常会给患者带来不适。我们比较了两种鼻局部麻醉技术,一组使用利多卡因喷雾剂(A组:25例患者),另一组使用凝胶(B组:30例患者),以评估患者对该操作的耐受性。两组患者在鼻孔均接受100mg利多卡因,口咽接受40 - 50mg,声带接受120mg,气管和支气管接受40 - 100mg。咽喉麻醉是两组患者最常经历的不适环节(34.5%),其次是支气管检查(30.6%)和鼻麻醉(21.8%)。与B组相比,A组患者在鼻麻醉期间经历不适或疼痛的人数显著更多(p < 0.001)。两组患者对支气管镜检查的耐受性相似,所有患者的检查均顺利完成。因此,与利多卡因喷雾剂相比,利多卡因凝胶用于鼻局部麻醉是一种简单、有效且刺激性较小的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验