Steinhausen H C, Seidel R
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Nov;14(3):367-74. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199311)14:3<367::aid-eat2260140315>3.0.co;2-c.
Questionnaire scores were compared across three outcome groups in a follow-up of eating-disordered patients with onset of the disease during adolescence. Among a total of 40 patients, 7 continued to suffer from either anorexia or bulimia nervosa. Seven additional patients displayed partial syndromes and 26 had recovered. Both a semantic differential measuring body image and the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) demonstrated limited evidence of clinical sensitivity by differentiating the three outcome groups. The Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI) did not discriminate the three outcome groups. Obviously, clinical interviews and self-report questionnaires tackle different facets of the eating disorders and, therefore, both should be used in outcome studies.
在对青春期发病的饮食失调患者进行随访时，对三个结果组的问卷得分进行了比较。在总共40名患者中，7名继续患有神经性厌食症或神经性贪食症。另外7名患者表现出部分综合征，26名患者已康复。通过区分三个结果组，测量身体形象的语义差异量表和饮食态度测试（EAT）均显示出有限的临床敏感性证据。饮食失调量表（EDI）未能区分这三个结果组。显然，临床访谈和自我报告问卷涉及饮食失调的不同方面，因此，两者都应用于结果研究。
