• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饮食失调多因素治疗结果测量方法的开发与验证

Development and validation of a multifactorial treatment outcome measure for eating disorders.

作者信息

Anderson D A, Williamson D A, Duchmann E G, Gleaves D H, Barbin J M

机构信息

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 70803-5501, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 1999 Mar;6(1):7-20. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600102.

DOI:10.1177/107319119900600102
PMID:9971879
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to develop a brief self-report inventory which could be used to evaluate treatment outcome for anorexia and bulimia nervosa. The Multifactorial Assessment of Eating Disorders Symptoms (MAEDS) was constructed to measure six symptom clusters which have been found to be central to the eating disorders: depression, binge eating, purgative behavior, fear of fatness, restrictive eating, and avoidance of forbidden foods. The factor structure of the MAEDS was found to be stable and it was found to have satisfactory reliability and validity. Normative data were collected so that raw scores could be converted to standardized scores. While still in the experimental stages, the MAEDS shows promise as a valid and economical measure of treatment interventions for anorexia and bulimia nervosa.

摘要

本调查的目的是开发一种简短的自我报告量表,用于评估神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症的治疗效果。饮食失调症状多因素评估量表(MAEDS)旨在测量六个已被发现是饮食失调核心的症状群:抑郁、暴饮暴食、清除行为、对肥胖的恐惧、限制性饮食以及避免食用禁食。研究发现MAEDS的因子结构稳定,且具有令人满意的信度和效度。收集了常模数据,以便将原始分数转换为标准化分数。虽然仍处于实验阶段,但MAEDS有望成为一种有效且经济的神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症治疗干预措施的测量工具。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a multifactorial treatment outcome measure for eating disorders.饮食失调多因素治疗结果测量方法的开发与验证
Assessment. 1999 Mar;6(1):7-20. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600102.
2
Criterion validity of the multiaxial assessment of eating disorders symptoms.饮食失调症状多轴评估的效标效度。
Int J Eat Disord. 2000 Nov;28(3):303-10. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(200011)28:3<303::aid-eat7>3.0.co;2-i.
3
Development of the eating disorder recovery self-efficacy questionnaire.饮食失调康复自我效能问卷的编制
Int J Eat Disord. 2006 Jul;39(5):376-84. doi: 10.1002/eat.20256.
4
Early maladaptive schemas and body mass index in subgroups of eating disorders: a differential association.饮食失调亚组中的早期适应不良图式与体重指数:一种差异关联。
Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
5
Correspondence between the clinical assessment of eating-disordered patients and findings derived from questionnaires at follow-up.饮食失调患者的临床评估与随访时问卷调查结果之间的相关性。
Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Nov;14(3):367-74. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199311)14:3<367::aid-eat2260140315>3.0.co;2-c.
6
Assessment of cognitive variable relevant to cognitive behavioral perspectives on anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.对与神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症的认知行为观点相关的认知变量的评估。
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Jan;33(1):95-105. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)e0032-e.
7
Temperament and character profile of eating disorders: a controlled study with the Temperament and Character Inventory.饮食失调的气质与性格剖析:一项使用气质与性格量表的对照研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Dec;32(4):412-25. doi: 10.1002/eat.10099.
8
Predictors of binge eating in restrictive anorexia nervosa patients in Italy.意大利限制型神经性厌食症患者暴饮暴食的预测因素。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Sep;194(9):712-5. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000235783.29257.b1.
9
Eating disorder diagnostic scale: additional evidence of reliability and validity.饮食失调诊断量表:可靠性和有效性的更多证据
Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):60-71. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.60.
10
Analysis of multi-instrumental assessment of eating disorders: comparison between Anorexia and Bulimia.进食障碍的多仪器评估分析:厌食症与贪食症的比较。
Psychiatr Danub. 2012 Sep;24 Suppl 1:S119-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Mindfulness-based interventions for binge eating: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.基于正念的暴饮暴食干预措施:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Behav Med. 2025 Feb;48(1):57-89. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00550-5. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-Eating Disorder Across the Lifespan.神经性贪食症和暴食症的全生命周期研究
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Jul;22(3):278-287. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240001. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Loss of control as a transdiagnostic feature in obesity-related eating behaviours: A systematic review.
失控作为肥胖相关进食行为的一种跨诊断特征:系统综述。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2023 Jan;31(1):24-45. doi: 10.1002/erv.2936. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
The Complicated Relationship between Dieting, Dietary Restraint, Caloric Restriction, and Eating Disorders: Is a Shift in Public Health Messaging Warranted?节食、饮食抑制、热量限制与饮食失调之间复杂的关系:是否需要改变公共卫生信息传递?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 3;19(1):491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010491.
5
Effect of 8 weeks of supervised overfeeding on eating attitudes and behaviors, eating disorder symptoms, and body image: Results from the PROOF and EAT studies.8 周监督性过量进食对饮食态度和行为、饮食失调症状和身体意象的影响:来自 PROOF 和 EAT 研究的结果。
Eat Behav. 2021 Dec;43:101570. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101570. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Development and validation of the Multidimensional Internally Regulated Eating Scale (MIRES).多维内部调节进食量表(MIRES)的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0239904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239904. eCollection 2020.
7
Effects of caloric restriction on human physiological, psychological, and behavioral outcomes: highlights from CALERIE phase 2.热量限制对人类生理、心理和行为结果的影响:CALERIE 阶段 2 的重点。
Nutr Rev. 2021 Jan 1;79(1):98-113. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa085.
8
Vegetarians and omnivores with diagnosed eating disorders exhibit no difference in symptomology: a retrospective clinical chart review.患有饮食失调症的素食者和杂食者在症状上没有差异:回顾性临床图表分析。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Apr;26(3):1007-1012. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00903-w. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Baseline Habitual Physical Activity Predicts Weight Loss, Weight Compensation, and Energy Intake During Aerobic Exercise.基础习惯性体力活动可预测有氧运动期间的体重减轻、体重补偿和能量摄入。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 May;28(5):882-892. doi: 10.1002/oby.22766. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Effect of different doses of supervised exercise on food intake, metabolism, and non-exercise physical activity: The E-MECHANIC randomized controlled trial.不同剂量监督运动对摄食量、代谢和非运动性身体活动的影响:E-MECHANIC 随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Sep 1;110(3):583-592. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz054.