Beasley C M, Potvin J H
Psychopharmacology Division, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Winter;8(4):271-5.
Serotonin uptake inhibitors are generally considered activating antidepressants. To assess the rates and temporal patterns of activation and sedation as well as dose-effect relationships, adverse event data were evaluated from a fixed-dose study comparing placebo and fluoxetine, 5, 20 and 40 mg/day, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (n = 363) and the pooled data from two fixed-dose studies comparing placebo and fluoxetine, 20, 40 and 60 mg/day, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (n = 746). The adverse events 'nervousness', 'anxiety', 'agitation' and 'insomnia' were considered indicative of activation; 'somnolence' and 'asthenia' were considered indicative of sedation. Activation and sedation were both statistically significant treatment-emergent phenomena (p < or = 0.05), but dose-effect relationships differed. Activation rates were relatively stable between 5 mg/day and 40 mg/day, but they increased at 60 mg/day. Sedation rates increased linearly up to 40 mg/day, and then were comparable at 40 mg/day and 60 mg/day. Discontinuations due to either phenomenon were uncommon. The temporal patterns of first occurrences and persistence of activation and sedation differed. First occurrences of activation peaked early and declined over time at all doses. First occurrences of sedation also peaked early at all doses, but there may have been greater variability in first occurrences of sedation over time in patients receiving lower doses. The persistent occurrences of sedation may decline less over time than the persistent occurrences of activation.
血清素摄取抑制剂通常被认为是具有激活作用的抗抑郁药。为了评估激活和镇静的发生率、时间模式以及剂量效应关系,我们从一项固定剂量研究中评估了不良事件数据,该研究比较了安慰剂和氟西汀(每日5、20和40毫克)治疗重度抑郁症(n = 363)的情况,以及两项固定剂量研究的汇总数据,这两项研究比较了安慰剂和氟西汀(每日20、40和60毫克)治疗重度抑郁症(n = 746)的情况。不良事件“紧张”“焦虑”“激动”和“失眠”被认为表明有激活作用;“嗜睡”和“乏力”被认为表明有镇静作用。激活和镇静都是具有统计学意义的治疗中出现的现象(p≤0.05),但剂量效应关系有所不同。激活率在每日5毫克至40毫克之间相对稳定,但在每日60毫克时有所增加。镇静率在每日40毫克之前呈线性增加,然后在每日40毫克和60毫克时相当。因这两种现象导致的停药情况并不常见。激活和镇静首次出现的时间模式以及持续情况有所不同。激活的首次出现均在早期达到峰值,并随时间下降。镇静的首次出现在所有剂量下也都在早期达到峰值,但接受较低剂量的患者中,镇静首次出现的时间随时间的变化可能更大。镇静的持续出现随时间下降的幅度可能小于激活的持续出现。