Lauri A, Horton R C, Davidson B R, Burroughs A K, Dooley J S
Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London.
Gut. 1993 Dec;34(12):1718-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.12.1718.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy has become the first line treatment for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones. This technique may fail, however, due to difficult anatomy, previous surgery, periampullary diverticula or the presence of a large stone. The importance of stone size to the success of endoscopic sphincterotomy has not been fully assessed. A prospective study was carried out over the period January 1987 to December 1989 on 100 patients (45 male, 55 female, median age 69 years, range 19-97) with CBD stones in which a policy of early duct clearance was followed. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed and the stone size and number recorded from the cholangiograms and corrected for magnification. Sphincterotomy was performed using a diathermy unit with a cutting current and stones were extracted using a balloon catheter or a Dormia basket. Of the 100 patients with CBD stones receiving ERCP, successful clearance of the biliary tree was possible in seven without endoscopic sphincterotomy and five were felt to be unsuitable for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Of the remaining 88 patients endoscopic sphincterotomy was successful in 75 (85%). Of the 75 patients having endoscopic sphincterotomy stone clearance was successful in 44 (59%). There were no deaths and only four complications, which rapidly resolved on conservative treatment (two acute pancreatitis, two bleeding). The number of CBD stones present was similar in those patients with successful endoscopic sphincterotomy and duct clearance (median 1, range 1-10, n = 44) as in those in whom it failed (median 2, range 1-6, n = 31). In contrast there was a highly significant difference when stone size was analysed (successful clearance median stone size 10 mm, range 3-27 mm; unsuccessful: median 18 mm, range 10-42, p<0.001). Stones less than 10 mm in diameter (n=21) were all removed successfully whereas in patients with stones over 15 mm (n=25) only three were removed endoscopically (12%). All patients with evidence of residual stones had additional treatment. Of these 31 patients, 10 had surgery, 11 had insertion of an endoprosthesis, and 10 had dissolution treatment with methyl-tert-butyl ether through a nasobiliary catheter. This study shows the importance of stone size to the success rate of endoscopic removal of bile duct stones.
内镜括约肌切开术已成为胆总管(CBD)结石患者的一线治疗方法。然而,由于解剖结构复杂、既往手术史、壶腹周围憩室或存在大结石,该技术可能会失败。结石大小对内镜括约肌切开术成功与否的重要性尚未得到充分评估。1987年1月至1989年12月对100例CBD结石患者(45例男性,55例女性,年龄中位数69岁,范围19 - 97岁)进行了一项前瞻性研究,采用早期胆管清除策略。进行了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),并从胆管造影中记录结石大小和数量,并对放大倍数进行校正。使用带有切割电流的透热装置进行括约肌切开术,并用球囊导管或多尔米亚篮取出结石。在接受ERCP的100例CBD结石患者中,7例未进行内镜括约肌切开术就成功清除了胆管结石,5例被认为不适合进行内镜括约肌切开术。在其余88例患者中,内镜括约肌切开术成功75例(85%)。在75例行内镜括约肌切开术的患者中,结石清除成功44例(59%)。无死亡病例,仅4例并发症,经保守治疗后迅速缓解(2例急性胰腺炎,2例出血)。内镜括约肌切开术和胆管清除成功的患者(中位数1个,范围1 - 10个,n = 44)与失败患者(中位数2个,范围1 - 6个,n = 31)的CBD结石数量相似。相比之下,分析结石大小时存在高度显著差异(成功清除结石的中位数大小为10 mm,范围3 - 27 mm;未成功清除的:中位数18 mm,范围10 - 42,p<0.001)。直径小于10 mm的结石(n = 21)全部成功取出,而结石大于15 mm的患者(n = 25)中,仅3例经内镜取出(12%)。所有有残余结石证据的患者均接受了额外治疗。在这31例患者中,10例行手术治疗,11例置入内支架,10例通过鼻胆管导管用甲基叔丁基醚进行溶石治疗。这项研究表明结石大小对内镜下清除胆管结石成功率的重要性。