Suppr超能文献

通过对资助申请和文章的批判性审查来促进教师发展和研究。

Facilitating faculty development and research through critical review of grant proposals and articles.

作者信息

Baldwin C D, Goldblum R M, Rassin D K, Levine H G

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0351.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1994 Jan;69(1):62-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199401000-00018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 1983 the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston established a faculty development program to address faculty needs for continuing education and improved resources for research. At first a part-time coordinator was hired; then, in 1985, a full-time, faculty-level science communicator provided help with strategic planning of projects and intensive review of grant proposals and journal articles. Faculty participation in the program was voluntary.

METHOD

Pre- and post-intervention data for 1983-1992 included numbers of faculty using the program, faculty evaluations of the program, grant dollars awarded, counts of grant submissions and awards, and numbers of published articles.

RESULTS

The review services were used heavily for grant proposals (75% of the department's proposals), but were used lightly for research articles (18% of publications). Grant funding quadrupled from 1983 to 1988; although funding peaked in 1988, it thereafter remained at three to four times the 1983 level. In contrast, the mean number of publications per faculty per year dropped between 1983 and 1990.

CONCLUSION

The program provided valuable assistance to the faculty in writing grant proposals, and it helped to generate critically needed resources. However, the program's failure to increase the publication productivity of the faculty suggests that despite financial pressures, similar programs should use their influence and resources to promote a balance between scholarly publication and grant acquisition.

摘要

背景

1983年,加尔维斯顿德克萨斯大学医学分校儿科学系设立了一个教师发展项目,以满足教师继续教育的需求并改善研究资源。起初雇佣了一名兼职协调员;然后,在1985年,一名全职的教师级科学传播者为项目的战略规划以及资助申请和期刊文章的深入评审提供帮助。教师参与该项目是自愿的。

方法

1983 - 1992年的干预前后数据包括使用该项目的教师人数、教师对该项目的评价、授予的资助金额、资助申请和奖励的数量以及发表文章的数量。

结果

评审服务在资助申请方面被大量使用(占该系申请的75%),但在研究文章方面使用较少(占出版物的18%)。资助资金从1983年到1988年增长了四倍;尽管资助在1988年达到峰值,但此后仍保持在1983年水平的三到四倍。相比之下,1983年至1990年间每位教师每年的平均发表文章数量有所下降。

结论

该项目在撰写资助申请方面为教师提供了宝贵的帮助,并有助于产生急需的资源。然而,该项目未能提高教师的发表产出,这表明尽管存在财务压力,但类似项目应利用其影响力和资源来促进学术发表和资助获取之间的平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验