Kano S, Burton D L, Lanteri C J, Sly P D
Division of Clinical Science, W.A. Research Institute for Child Health, Perth.
Eur Respir J. 1993 Oct;6(9):1347-52.
It is still unknown whether peak expiratory flow (PEF) is determined by "wave speed" flow limitation in the airways. To investigate the influences of airway mechanical properties on PEF, five healthy adults performed maximal forced expiratory effort (MFEE) manoeuvres, in the standard manner and following breathholds at total lung capacity (TLC) of 2 s and 10 s. Oesophageal pressure (Poes) was measured as an index of respiratory effort. Subjects also performed a MFEE following a 10 s breathhold during which intrathoracic pressure was voluntarily raised by a Valsalva manoeuvre, which would increase transmural pressure and cross-sectional area of the extrathoracic airway. Additional MFEEs were performed with the neck fully flexed and extended, to change longitudinal tracheal tension. In separate studies, PEF was measured with a spirometer and with a pneumotachograph. Breathholds at TLC (2 s and 10 s), and neck flexion reduced PEF by a mean of 9.8% (SD 2.9%), 9.6% (SD 1.6%), and 8.7% (SD 2.8%), respectively, when measured with the spirometer. The same pattern of results was seen when measured with the pneumotachograph. These reductions occurred despite similar respiratory effort. Voluntarily raising intrathoracic pressure during a 10 s breathhold did not reverse a fall in PEF. MFEE manoeuvre with neck extension did not result in an increase in PEF, the group mean % changes being -3.0% (SD 5.0%). We conclude that these results do not allow the hypothesis that "wave-speed" (Vws) is reached at PEF to be rejected. A breathhold at TLC could increase airway wall compliance by allowing stress-relaxation of the airway, thus reducing the "Vws" achievable.
目前仍不清楚呼气峰值流速(PEF)是否由气道中的“波速”气流受限所决定。为了研究气道力学特性对PEF的影响,五名健康成年人以标准方式进行了最大用力呼气动作(MFEE),并在肺总量(TLC)下屏气2秒和10秒后进行该动作。测量食管压力(Poes)作为呼吸用力的指标。受试者还在10秒屏气期间进行了MFEE,在此期间通过瓦尔萨尔瓦动作(Valsalva maneuver)主动升高胸内压,这会增加胸外气道的跨壁压和横截面积。另外,在颈部完全屈曲和伸展的情况下进行了额外的MFEE,以改变气管纵向张力。在单独的研究中,使用肺活量计和呼吸流速仪测量PEF。当用肺活量计测量时,TLC下屏气(2秒和10秒)以及颈部屈曲分别使PEF平均降低9.8%(标准差2.9%)、9.6%(标准差1.6%)和8.7%(标准差2.8%)。当用呼吸流速仪测量时,观察到相同的结果模式。尽管呼吸用力相似,但仍出现了这些降低。在10秒屏气期间主动升高胸内压并不能逆转PEF的下降。颈部伸展的MFEE动作并未导致PEF增加,组平均变化百分比为-3.0%(标准差5.0%)。我们得出结论,这些结果并不足以否定在PEF时达到“波速”(Vws)的假设。TLC下屏气可通过使气道应力松弛来增加气道壁顺应性,从而降低可达到的“Vws”。