Suppr超能文献

外科治疗中心能否减少等候名单?一项自然实验的结果。

Can a surgical treatment centre reduce waiting lists? Results of a natural experiment.

作者信息

Harvey I, Webb M, Dowse J

机构信息

University of Wales College of Medicine, Centre for Applied Public Health Medicine, Cardiff.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Oct;47(5):373-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.5.373.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of the Welsh general surgery (hernia and varicose veins) treatment centre established as part of the NHS reforms, in terms of its impact upon throughput and waiting lists.

DESIGN

This was a natural experiment with two control groups--other surgical specialties without treatment centre provision, and general surgery in districts that made only minor use of the facility.

SETTING

General Surgery Treatment Centre, Bridgend General Hospital.

SUBJECTS

All patients referred between 1 April 1990 and 31 March 1991.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Main outcome measures were throughput for hernia and varicose vein operations, non-urgent inpatient waiting list lengths before and after the opening of the centre and patient satisfaction. Altogether 1097 patients were referred during the year. Of these, 160 (15%) did not attend outpatient assessment and 79 (8%) of those who did were unsuitable for surgery. A total of 750 operations were performed--448 (60%) for varicose veins and 261 (35%) hernia repairs. Among the residents of the four main districts using the centre (with valid data available), there was a significant increase in the total number of varicose vein operations performed but no significant increase in hernia repairs. In the six districts that made major use of the centre, general surgery waiting lists for non-urgent cases fell significantly (p < 0.0001) while those for ear, nose, and throat showed no significant change and gynaecology lists lengthened significantly (p < 0.0001). In the three districts that made minor use of the centre general surgery waiting lists showed no change.

CONCLUSIONS

Relations between inputs and waiting lists are often unpredictable, but after controlling for confounding trends there is sound evidence that such a centre provides an acceptable and effective approach to the waiting list problem.

摘要

研究目的

确定作为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)改革一部分设立的威尔士普通外科(疝气和静脉曲张)治疗中心对诊疗量和候诊名单的影响效果。

设计

这是一项有两个对照组的自然实验,对照组分别为未设立治疗中心的其他外科专科,以及仅少量使用该设施的地区的普通外科。

地点

布里真德综合医院普通外科治疗中心。

研究对象

1990年4月1日至1991年3月31日期间转诊的所有患者。

测量指标及主要结果

主要结局指标为疝气和静脉曲张手术的诊疗量、中心开放前后非紧急住院患者候诊名单的长度以及患者满意度。该年共转诊1097例患者。其中,160例(15%)未参加门诊评估,参加评估的患者中有79例(8%)不适合手术。共进行了750台手术,其中448例(60%)为静脉曲张手术,261例(35%)为疝气修补手术。在使用该中心的四个主要地区的居民中(有有效数据),静脉曲张手术的总数显著增加,但疝气修补手术数量未显著增加。在大量使用该中心的六个地区,非紧急病例的普通外科候诊名单显著下降(p<0.0001),而耳鼻喉科候诊名单无显著变化,妇科候诊名单显著延长(p<0.0001)。在少量使用该中心的三个地区,普通外科候诊名单无变化。

结论

投入与候诊名单之间的关系往往不可预测,但在控制混杂趋势后,有充分证据表明这样的中心为候诊名单问题提供了一种可接受且有效的解决方法。

相似文献

2
A census of patients waiting for treatment or consultation in surgical specialties in an English health region.
Community Med. 1989 Feb;11(1):13-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042441.
5
6
Dissecting a waiting list.剖析等待名单。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1991 Jul;4(2):112-9. doi: 10.1177/095148489100400204.
8
Is there a relation between waiting-list length and surgery rate?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1994 Jul-Sep;9(3):259-65. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740090306.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritising waiting lists.
Health Trends. 1990;22(3):103-8.
3
Surgical waiting lists.手术等候名单。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 4;289(6440):271-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6440.271.
4
Inpatient waiting: a discussion and policy proposal.住院等待:一场讨论与政策建议
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 12;287(6403):1483-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6403.1483.
7
NHS reforms: the first six months.英国国家医疗服务体系改革:头六个月
BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):199-200. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.199.
8
Public opinion and purchasing.公众舆论与购买行为。
BMJ. 1992 Mar 14;304(6828):680-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6828.680.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验