van Schaik J P, de Jong R D, Bos M J, van Birgelen M G, Koren J B, van Waes P F
Academisch Ziekenhuis, afd. Radiodiagnostiek, Utrecht.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Dec 25;137(52):2723-7.
Evaluation of an objective, standardised method for selection of residents for medical specialty training.
Retrospective.
University Hospital Utrecht, department of diagnostic radiology. Utrecht University, Department of Clinical Psychology and Health Psychology.
All applicants for residency positions in 1990-1991 were requested to complete a standard application form. The applications were judged by seven staff members on six criteria. Using statistical tests the relative contribution of each criterium was calculated. A similar procedure was followed for those who were invited for an interview.
Most of the criteria applied for the written and oral applications contributed significantly to the rank order achieved. The written and oral criteria showed some degree of overlap, whilst the criteria used for the written application were relatively independent from those used for the interview. For a balanced evaluation of the written information a selection committee of four staff members was sufficient.
Structuring the selection process as described gives both staff and applicants more insight in the criteria applied, and thus allows a more objective and valid evaluation. To medical students it is beneficial to become acquainted with criteria that may be used in selection procedures for medical specialty training, so they can prepare themselves adequately.
评估一种用于选拔医学专业培训住院医师的客观、标准化方法。
回顾性研究。
乌得勒支大学医院诊断放射科。乌得勒支大学临床心理学与健康心理学系。
要求所有1990 - 1991年申请住院医师职位的人员填写一份标准申请表。七名工作人员根据六项标准对申请表进行评判。通过统计检验计算每个标准的相对贡献。受邀参加面试的人员也遵循类似程序。
用于书面和口头申请的大多数标准对最终排名有显著贡献。书面和口头标准存在一定程度的重叠,而用于书面申请的标准与用于面试的标准相对独立。由四名工作人员组成的选拔委员会足以对书面信息进行全面评估。
按照所述构建选拔过程,能让工作人员和申请者更清楚了解所应用的标准,从而实现更客观、有效的评估。对于医学生而言,熟悉医学专业培训选拔程序中可能使用的标准是有益的,这样他们就能充分做好准备。