Juneja A, Murthy N S, Sharma S, Shukla D K, Roy M, Das D K
Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (ICMR), Maulana Azad Medical College Campus, New Delhi, India.
Neoplasma. 1993;40(6):401-4.
Cervical cancer is one of the leading malignancies seen in Indian women. It has been well established that organized cervical cytology screening program is the mainstay for control of cervical cancer. It is not possible to carry out cervical cytology screening for masses in India due to paucity of human and financial resources. Hence there is a need for development of an alternate strategy to concentrate on women with high risk. In the present communication attempt was made to define a high risk group based on sociodemographic factors, viz. age, parity, education and clinical features. A total of 67,000 women were screened of which in 250 malignancy was detected. The rate of malignancy was observed to be high in women above 40 years (10.5/1000) with more than two children (6.1/1000) and in illiterate group (4.9/1000) as compared to women below 40 years, more than 3 children and illiterate group. Similarly, the rates were higher in women with clinical diagnosis of cervical erosion which bled on touch, unhealthy cervix and suspicious looking cervix, malignancy rates were 17.1, 24.7, 263.2 (per 1000), respectively. An attempt was made to study the combined effect of all the six factors (sociodemographic and clinical) by employing the technique of linear discriminant analysis to find out the discrimination power between the normal and malignant women. Discriminant score thus obtained would help to classify the case for subjecting to cervical cytology. It was observed that the model containing sociodemographic and clinical variables was able to classify 69% of malignant cases correctly. When the clinical variables were dropped from the model, the sensitivity dropped to 65%. The above exercise indicated that based on the discriminant score even in the absence of facilities for clinical examination of women, it may be possible to identify women of high risk group for subjecting them to cervical cytology screening.
宫颈癌是印度女性中主要的恶性肿瘤之一。组织化的宫颈细胞学筛查项目是控制宫颈癌的主要手段,这一点已经得到充分证实。由于人力和财力资源匮乏,在印度对大量人群进行宫颈细胞学筛查是不可能的。因此,需要制定一种替代策略,专注于高危女性。在本报告中,尝试根据社会人口统计学因素,即年龄、产次、教育程度和临床特征,定义一个高危人群。总共对67000名女性进行了筛查,其中检测出250例恶性肿瘤。观察到40岁以上(10.5/1000)、有两个以上孩子(6.1/1000)以及文盲组(4.9/1000)的女性恶性肿瘤发生率高于40岁以下、有三个以上孩子以及非文盲组的女性。同样,临床诊断为宫颈糜烂且触诊出血、宫颈不健康和宫颈外观可疑的女性发生率更高,恶性肿瘤发生率分别为17.1、24.7、263.2(每1000人)。尝试通过线性判别分析技术研究所有六个因素(社会人口统计学和临床因素)的综合作用,以找出正常女性和恶性女性之间的判别能力。由此获得的判别分数将有助于对病例进行分类以进行宫颈细胞学检查。观察到包含社会人口统计学和临床变量的模型能够正确分类69%的恶性病例。当从模型中剔除临床变量时,敏感性降至65%。上述研究表明,基于判别分数,即使在没有女性临床检查设施的情况下,也有可能识别出高危女性群体,以便对她们进行宫颈细胞学筛查。