Gordon J
Department of Microbiology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 1993;69 Suppl 3:S106-16.
This review summarizes the natural history, clinical relevance and basis of control of Staphylococcus aureus infection in UK hospitals, stressing the central role of asymptomatic carriage by patients and staff in persistence of this prolific and versatile nosocomial pathogen. The clinical relevance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MRSA and MSSA) is considered in terms of prevalence and spectrum of invasive and toxigenic infections produced, correlated with host and parasite risk factors. An assessment is made of arguments why the acquisition of methicillin-resistance or multiple antibiotic resistance might justify more than conventional methods of containment and how the control policy is influenced by the expression of enhanced virulence and epidemicity. Guidelines for control of epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) are discussed with reference to justification, feasibility and efficacy. As elimination of carriage is crucial to the success of any rational control policy the relative merits of topical antibiotics and antiseptic agents are compared. The bacterial efficacy of povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine and mupirocin are evaluated as a basis for eradication of MRSA.
本综述总结了英国医院金黄色葡萄球菌感染的自然史、临床相关性及控制基础,强调患者和医护人员无症状携带在这种多产且多能的医院病原体持续存在中的核心作用。从侵袭性和产毒感染的发生率及范围方面考虑耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA和MSSA)的临床相关性,并将其与宿主和病原体风险因素相关联。对为何获得耐甲氧西林或多重耐药性可能需要比传统控制方法更严格措施的观点进行了评估,以及控制策略如何受到增强的毒力和流行性表达的影响。参照合理性、可行性和有效性讨论了控制流行性MRSA(EMRSA)的指南。由于消除携带对于任何合理控制策略的成功至关重要,因此比较了局部用抗生素和抗菌剂的相对优点。评估聚维酮碘、氯己定和莫匹罗星的杀菌效力,作为根除MRSA的基础。