• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

效应量作为衡量临床试验中症状特异性药物变化的指标。

Effect size as a measure of symptom-specific drug change in clinical trials.

作者信息

Leon A C, Shear M K, Portera L, Klerman G L

机构信息

Cornell University Medical College, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY 10021.

出版信息

Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):163-7.

PMID:8290660
Abstract

A data-analytic strategy is proposed for identifying the symptom-specific effects of each medication in a clinical trial. The within-group effect size is a standardized ratio of the pre-post change relative to the stability of change for each treatment group. Advantages of using this descriptive approach are illustrated by examining antidepressant effects of alprazolam, imipramine, and placebo in a clinical trial for patients meeting criteria for both panic disorder and depression. There was a significant difference between active medication and placebo on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total, but no difference between the anti-depressant effects of the active medications despite their diverse psychopharmacologic properties. Examination of effect sizes for each HAM-D item revealed distinct symptom-specific effects of each active medication in this study sample. Although these descriptive findings cannot be used for inferential conclusions, they can be used to guide the design of future trials.

摘要

本文提出了一种数据分析策略,用于在临床试验中识别每种药物的症状特异性效应。组内效应量是每个治疗组前后变化相对于变化稳定性的标准化比率。通过在一项针对符合惊恐障碍和抑郁症标准患者的临床试验中检查阿普唑仑、丙咪嗪和安慰剂的抗抑郁作用,说明了使用这种描述性方法的优势。在汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)总分上,活性药物与安慰剂之间存在显著差异,但尽管活性药物具有不同的精神药理特性,它们的抗抑郁作用之间没有差异。对每个HAM-D项目的效应量进行检查,揭示了本研究样本中每种活性药物独特的症状特异性效应。虽然这些描述性结果不能用于推断结论,但它们可用于指导未来试验的设计。

相似文献

1
Effect size as a measure of symptom-specific drug change in clinical trials.效应量作为衡量临床试验中症状特异性药物变化的指标。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):163-7.
2
Clinical outcome and adverse effect profile associated with concurrent administration of alprazolam and imipramine.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1988 Oct;49(10):394-9.
3
Factors that influence the outcome of placebo-controlled antidepressant clinical trials.影响安慰剂对照抗抑郁药物临床试验结果的因素。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):41-51.
4
Comparison of alprazolam and imipramine for treatment of outpatient depression.阿普唑仑与丙咪嗪治疗门诊抑郁症的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Jan;48(1):15-9.
5
The pharmacotherapy of depressive illness in adolescence: I. An open label trial of imipramine.青少年抑郁症的药物治疗:I. 丙咪嗪的开放标签试验。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1990;26(1):80-4.
6
Implications of restrictive diagnosis for compliance to antidepressant drug therapy: alprazolam versus imipramine.对抗抑郁药物治疗依从性的限制性诊断的影响:阿普唑仑与丙咪嗪对比
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;48(2):51-4.
7
Urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol and the depression-type score as predictors of differential responses to antidepressants.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991 Dec;11(6):339-43.
8
Gepirone extended-release treatment of anxious depression: evidence from a retrospective subgroup analysis in patients with major depressive disorder.阿吡哌隆缓释剂治疗伴焦虑的抑郁症:来自重度抑郁症患者回顾性亚组分析的证据
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;65(8):1069-75.
9
Efficacy of imipramine in psychotic versus nonpsychotic depression.丙咪嗪治疗伴有精神病性症状与无精神病性症状抑郁症的疗效比较
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):166-70. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318166c51c.
10
Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in patients with nonmelancholic depressive disorders.非忧郁性抑郁症患者中舍曲林与丙咪嗪治疗反应的性别差异。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;28(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00177-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.一项基于正念减压疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的多中心随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2019 Oct 1;1(2):39-48. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20180002. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Benzodiazepines versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍中苯二氮䓬类药物与安慰剂的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 28;3(3):CD010677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010677.pub2.
3
Antidepressants and benzodiazepines for panic disorder in adults.
成人惊恐障碍用抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 12;9(9):CD011567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011567.pub2.
4
The course of depression in late life as measured by the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale in an observational study of hospitalized patients.在一项针对住院患者的观察性研究中,用蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表测量的老年期抑郁症病程。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 5;15:191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0577-8.
5
An open-label pilot study of divalproex sodium for posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse.丙戊酸二钠治疗与童年期虐待相关的创伤后应激障碍的开放标签试验性研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Jan;64(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00003-1.
6
Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research.(准)实验设计中统计学显著变化与相关或重要变化的比较:卫生服务研究中估计干预相关变化幅度的一些概念和方法问题。
Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.65. Epub 2002 Dec 17.
7
An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report.抑郁症状快速清单与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表的评估:缓解抑郁试验报告的序贯治疗替代方案
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 15;59(6):493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.022. Epub 2005 Sep 30.