Spencer R C
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, U.K.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1993;91:25-32.
A multi-centre in-vitro study (8625 isolates) was conducted in 13 countries between May and November, 1992 to determine both the current bacterial epidemiology in intensive care and haematology/oncology units and the cross-susceptibility of the organisms to cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem and piperacillin. Bacterial species with 20 or more isolates resistant to one of the six antibiotics were examined for their susceptibility to the beta-lactams. Cefpirome and imipenem had the smallest total numbers of isolates. Bacteria resistant to ceftazidime or ceftriaxone were often susceptible (> 50%) to cefpirome. Conversely, cefpirome resistant isolates were frequently resistant (> 90%) to ceftazidime and ceftriaxone. P. aeruginosa was an exception, exhibiting cross-resistance to all cephalosporins. beta-lactamase producing Enterobacter, Citrobacter and Klebsiella spp. were especially resistant to piperacillin and ceftazidime but not cefpirome or imipenem. Two-thirds or more of coagulase-negative staphylococci resistant to any single agent, including imipenem, maintained their susceptibility to cefpirome. Cross-class resistance was not exhibited by imipenem and cefpirome against ciprofloxacin resistant isolates but was more evident for piperacillin, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone. Cefpirome was more active than ceftazidime against bacteria resistant to both piperacillin and gentamicin, especially coagulase-negative staphylococci (76% vs. 6%) and Enterobacter spp. (56% vs. 21%). Many coagulase-negative staphylococci and Enterobacter spp. susceptible to cefpirome (50-89%). These results suggest that cefpirome has a potential clinical advantage against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria resistant to other beta-lactams, including imipenem.
1992年5月至11月间,在13个国家开展了一项多中心体外研究(8625株分离菌),以确定重症监护病房以及血液科/肿瘤科当前的细菌流行病学情况,以及这些微生物对头孢匹罗、头孢他啶、头孢曲松、亚胺培南和哌拉西林的交叉敏感性。对六种抗生素中任何一种耐药菌株数达到或超过20株的细菌种类进行了β-内酰胺类药物敏感性检测。头孢匹罗和亚胺培南的分离菌总数最少。对头孢他啶或头孢曲松耐药的细菌通常对头孢匹罗敏感(>50%)。相反,对头孢匹罗耐药的分离菌往往对头孢他啶和头孢曲松耐药(>90%)。铜绿假单胞菌是个例外,对所有头孢菌素均表现出交叉耐药。产β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌属、柠檬酸杆菌属和克雷伯菌属对哌拉西林和头孢他啶特别耐药,但对头孢匹罗或亚胺培南不耐药。三分之二或更多对包括亚胺培南在内的任何单一药物耐药凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌对头孢匹罗仍保持敏感。亚胺培南和头孢匹罗对环丙沙星耐药分离菌未表现出交叉耐药,但哌拉西林、头孢他啶和头孢曲松的交叉耐药更为明显。头孢匹罗对同时耐哌拉西林和庆大霉素的细菌,尤其是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(76%对6%)和肠杆菌属(56%对21%),比头孢他啶更具活性。许多凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和肠杆菌属对头孢匹罗敏感(50 - 89%)。这些结果表明,头孢匹罗对于耐其他β-内酰胺类药物(包括亚胺培南)的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌具有潜在的临床优势。