Suppr超能文献

脊柱骨质疏松症的全身、脊柱和股骨双能X线吸收测定法

Total body, spine, and femur dual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

作者信息

Nuti R, Martini G, Gennari C

机构信息

Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Dec;53(6):388-93.

PMID:8293352
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to discriminate between normal and osteoporotic patients. A total of 152 postmenopausal women entered the study: 73 (aged 61.2 +/- 8 years) had established postmenopausal osteoporosis with one or more vertebral crushes on lateral X-ray of spine, and 79 (aged 59.3 +/- 7.8 years) had no vertebral fractures. Measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) in grams, bone mineral density (BMD) in g/cm2 and body composition (lean and fat mass in grams) of total body, lumbar spine (L2-L4), and femur (neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle) were carried out with a LUNAR DPX densitometer. In all sites, BMD values of osteoporotic patients were significantly lower than those of the control subjects. The higher Z-score was found for total body density (-2.14) followed by L2-L4 (-2.0), femoral neck (-1.93), Ward's triangle (-1.69), and trochanter (-1.4). Only the trochanter Z-score was significantly different compared with the other sites. A fracture threshold was determined for each site from osteoporotic patients and normal controls: with a sensitivity set at 90%, the best specificity was obtained at the lumbar spine and total body sites (89% and 84%, respectively). BMD values were highly related to lean and fat body mass, but bone loss with age was unrelated to soft tissue change. In conclusion, BMD measurements at different skeletal sites enable detection of spinal osteoporosis although sensitivity for femoral areas was less with respect to total body and L2-L4 BMD values.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估双能X线吸收法(DXA)区分正常患者和骨质疏松症患者的能力。共有152名绝经后女性参与了本研究:73名(年龄61.2±8岁)已确诊为绝经后骨质疏松症,脊柱侧位X线片显示有一处或多处椎体压缩;79名(年龄59.3±7.8岁)无椎体骨折。使用LUNAR DPX骨密度仪测量全身、腰椎(L2-L4)和股骨(颈、粗隆、沃德三角区)的骨矿物质含量(BMC,单位为克)、骨矿物质密度(BMD,单位为g/cm²)以及身体成分(瘦体重和脂肪量,单位为克)。在所有部位,骨质疏松症患者的BMD值均显著低于对照组。全身密度的Z值最高(-2.14),其次是L2-L4(-2.0)、股骨颈(-1.93)、沃德三角区(-1.69)和粗隆(-1.4)。只有粗隆的Z值与其他部位相比有显著差异。根据骨质疏松症患者和正常对照组确定了每个部位的骨折阈值:将敏感度设定为90%时,腰椎和全身部位的特异度最高(分别为89%和84%)。BMD值与瘦体重和脂肪量高度相关,但随年龄增长的骨质流失与软组织变化无关。总之,不同骨骼部位的BMD测量能够检测出脊柱骨质疏松症,尽管相对于全身和L2-L4的BMD值,股骨区域的敏感度较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验