Ueda H, Yamamoto Y, Arai M, Saito I, Nakata S
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University, School of Medicine.
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993 Dec;96(12):2065-72. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.96.2065.
Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) from 16 normal human ears and 26 normal guinea pig ears were measured with the ILO 88 (ver 3.91). The following results were obtained: 1) In one animal ear, waveforms of TEOAEs were unchanged after administration of muscle relaxants, and showed reversible changes before and after asphyxia. 2) In 3 guinea pig and 2 human ears, the input-output functions showed a strong saturation at higher stimulus levels, when measurement of the highest peak-to-peak amplitude was used as the output energy. 3) Highest peak frequencies (HPFs) of TEOAEs were distributed at around 1 kHz in human ears but were concentrated around frequencies of 2 kHz to 3 kHz in almost all guinea pig ears. 4) Latencies of predominant TEOAEs in human and guinea pig ears were 9.26 +/- 1.89 msec and 2.37 +/- 0.47 msec, respectively. Endpoint times of TEOAEs were 16.37 +/- 1.79 msec and 5.74 +/- 1.10 msec, respectively. Both indicators in human ears were 3-4 times longer than those in guinea pig ears. From these results, we conclude that click-evoked TEOAEs can be detected even in guinea pigs. In addition, our measurements showed that HPFs of TEOAEs in guinea pig ears were higher than those in human ears, and that latencies and durations in guinea pig ears were much shorter than those in human ears. The higher HPFs of TEOAEs in guinea pig ears may be attributable to higher resonant frequencies in the middle ear than are found in human ears.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
使用ILO 88(版本3.91)测量了16只正常人类耳朵和26只正常豚鼠耳朵的瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAEs)。得到以下结果:1)在一只动物耳朵中,肌肉松弛剂给药后TEOAEs的波形未改变,窒息前后呈现可逆变化。2)在3只豚鼠耳朵和2只人类耳朵中,当以测量最高峰峰值幅度作为输出能量时,输入-输出函数在较高刺激水平下表现出强烈饱和。3)人类耳朵中TEOAEs的最高峰值频率(HPFs)分布在1 kHz左右,但几乎所有豚鼠耳朵中的HPFs都集中在2 kHz至3 kHz频率附近。4)人类和豚鼠耳朵中主要TEOAEs的潜伏期分别为9.26±1.89毫秒和2.37±0.47毫秒。TEOAEs的终点时间分别为16.37±1.79毫秒和5.74±1.10毫秒。人类耳朵中的这两个指标比豚鼠耳朵中的长3至4倍。从这些结果来看,我们得出结论,即使在豚鼠中也能检测到短声诱发的TEOAEs。此外,我们的测量表明,豚鼠耳朵中TEOAEs的HPFs高于人类耳朵,并且豚鼠耳朵中的潜伏期和持续时间比人类耳朵短得多。豚鼠耳朵中TEOAEs较高的HPFs可能归因于中耳的共振频率高于人类耳朵。(摘要截短为250字)