Suppr超能文献

头部受伤患者院前治疗导致格拉斯哥昏迷量表初始评估出现的问题:一项全国性调查结果

Problems with initial Glasgow Coma Scale assessment caused by prehospital treatment of patients with head injuries: results of a national survey.

作者信息

Marion D W, Carlier P M

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1994 Jan;36(1):89-95. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199401000-00014.

Abstract

The rapid treatment of patients with a severe head injury often includes prehospital intubation and sedation, but such measures compromise the ability to obtain an accurate Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the emergency department (ED). Major head injury centers in the United States were surveyed to determine how they currently obtain initial GCS scores when these or other complicating circumstances exist. A two-page questionnaire was distributed to seven members of the trauma team at 17 major neurotrauma centers in which they were asked who usually determines the initial GCS score, where they are assessed, and when. Respondents were also asked how they assign scores for patients who received medications or were intubated before arrival at their hospital and how they score patients who are hypotensive, hypoxic, or have severe periorbital swelling. Most centers assess the initial GCS scores in their ED within 1 hour after the discovery of the patient by prehospital personnel. Most neurosurgeons said that hypotension and hypoxia are stabilized before the initial GCS scores are assessed and that intubated patients receive a non-numerical designation. But the majority of non-neurosurgical ED personnel said that they determine the initial GCS scores immediately after arrival of the patients in their department, regardless of hypoxia or hypotension. There also were significant discrepancies between attending neurosurgeons and their residents with regard to who actually assesses the GCS scores and how the scores are determined for patients who have received neuromuscular paralysis or sedation or who have severe periorbital swelling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

重型颅脑损伤患者的快速治疗通常包括院前插管和镇静,但这些措施会影响在急诊科(ED)获得准确格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分的能力。对美国主要的颅脑损伤中心进行了调查,以确定在存在这些或其他复杂情况时,他们目前如何获得初始GCS评分。向17个主要神经创伤中心的创伤团队的7名成员发放了一份两页的问卷,询问他们通常由谁来确定初始GCS评分、在何处进行评估以及何时评估。还询问了受访者如何为在到达医院之前接受过药物治疗或已插管的患者评分,以及如何为低血压、低氧或有严重眶周肿胀的患者评分。大多数中心在院前人员发现患者后1小时内在其急诊科评估初始GCS评分。大多数神经外科医生表示,在评估初始GCS评分之前会先稳定低血压和低氧情况,并且插管患者会得到一个非数字的标识。但大多数非神经外科急诊科人员表示,他们在患者到达科室后立即确定初始GCS评分,而不考虑低氧或低血压情况。在实际评估GCS评分的人员以及如何为接受神经肌肉麻痹或镇静治疗的患者或有严重眶周肿胀的患者确定评分方面,主治神经外科医生与其住院医师之间也存在显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验