Faris R, Ramzy R M, Gad A M, Weil G J, Buck A A
Centre for Research and Training on Vectors on Disease, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Nov-Dec;87(6):659-61. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(93)90277-w.
The objective of this study was to find the best tests for efficiently estimating the true prevalence of Bancroftian filariasis in endemic areas. The study population comprised 427 people over 10 years of age in an endemic village in Egypt. Four tests were evaluated; a standardized clinical examination, night blood examinations for microfilariae (50 microL thick films and 1 mL membrane filtration), and a test for circulating filarial antigen. 191 subjects (44.75%) had at least one positive test and were considered to have filariasis. The sensitivities of clinical examination, thick films, membrane filtration and antigen testing for filariasis were 16%, 50%, 64%, and 88%, respectively. Relative to membrane filtration of night blood, the filarial antigen test had a sensitivity of 97.5%, a positive predictive power of 71%, and a negative predictive power of 99%. None of the blood tests was a sensitive indicator of clinical filariasis; 69% of clinical cases were negative in all 3 blood tests and would have been missed if clinical examinations had not been done. Therefore, we recommend a combination of clinical examination and the filarial antigen test (with optional examination for microfilariae of those with positive antigen tests) for community diagnosis of Bancroftian filariasis in endemic areas.
本研究的目的是找到能有效估计流行地区班氏丝虫病真实流行率的最佳检测方法。研究人群包括埃及一个流行村庄中427名10岁以上的人。评估了四种检测方法:标准化临床检查、夜间血检微丝蚴(50微升厚涂片和1毫升膜过滤法)以及循环丝虫抗原检测。191名受试者(44.75%)至少有一项检测呈阳性,被认为患有丝虫病。临床检查、厚涂片、膜过滤法和丝虫病抗原检测的敏感性分别为16%、50%、64%和88%。相对于夜间血膜过滤法,丝虫抗原检测的敏感性为97.5%,阳性预测值为71%,阴性预测值为99%。没有一项血液检测是临床丝虫病的敏感指标;69%的临床病例在所有三项血液检测中均为阴性,如果未进行临床检查,这些病例将会漏诊。因此,我们建议在流行地区采用临床检查和丝虫抗原检测相结合的方法(对抗原检测呈阳性者可选择检测微丝蚴)来进行班氏丝虫病的社区诊断。