Suppr超能文献

挪威冬季抑郁症的治疗。II. 选择性单胺氧化酶A抑制剂吗氯贝胺与安慰剂的比较。

Treatment of winter depression in Norway. II. A comparison of the selective monoamine oxidase A inhibitor moclobemide and placebo.

作者信息

Lingjaerde O, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Haggag A, Gärtner I, Narud K, Berg E M

机构信息

Gaustad Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Nov;88(5):372-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03476.x.

Abstract

Thirty-four patients with seasonal affective disorder, winter depression type (WD) were randomly distributed to receive the selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor moclobemide (400 mg daily) or placebo in a double-blind, parallel group study lasting for up to 14 weeks. Severity measures were the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) extended with characteristic symptoms of WD; summed score of the "atypical" symptoms hypersomnia, hyperphagia and carbohydrate craving; and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI). After 3 weeks, patients with unsatisfactory response were switched to open moclobemide. Three patients on placebo dropped out before 3 weeks. Extended MADRS and CGI showed no significant difference between the groups at 3 weeks, whereas the atypical score was reduced significantly more on moclobemide than on placebo already after one week. Nonresponders after 3 weeks (9 of 16 on moclobemide and 7 of 15 on placebo) improved rapidly after being given open moclobemide. Predictor analysis showed a remarkably high negative correlation between improvement at 3 weeks (extended MADRS) and age in the placebo group and a strong, nonsignificant trend in the same direction in the moclobemide group. Dichotomizing the patients according to the median age (45 years) resulted in a somewhat better effect of moclobemide than placebo in the older age group. There were no significant differences in side effects between moclobemide and placebo.

摘要

在一项持续长达14周的双盲平行组研究中,34例季节性情感障碍冬季抑郁型(WD)患者被随机分配接受选择性单胺氧化酶-A抑制剂吗氯贝胺(每日400毫克)或安慰剂治疗。严重程度测量指标包括扩展了WD特征性症状的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS);“非典型”症状(嗜睡、多食和碳水化合物渴望)的总分;以及临床总体印象量表(CGI)。3周后,反应不佳的患者改为开放标签的吗氯贝胺治疗。3名服用安慰剂的患者在3周前退出。扩展的MADRS和CGI在3周时两组之间无显著差异,而在吗氯贝胺治疗组中,非典型症状评分在1周后就比安慰剂组显著降低更多。3周后无反应者(吗氯贝胺组16例中的9例和安慰剂组15例中的7例)在给予开放标签的吗氯贝胺后迅速改善。预测分析显示,安慰剂组3周时的改善情况(扩展MADRS)与年龄之间存在非常高的负相关性,吗氯贝胺组也有相同方向的强烈但不显著的趋势。根据年龄中位数(45岁)对患者进行二分法分析,结果显示在老年组中吗氯贝胺的疗效略优于安慰剂。吗氯贝胺和安慰剂在副作用方面无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验