Versiani M, Amrein R, Stabl M
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Jul;12(4):183-93. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199707000-00001.
An international, multicenter, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to determine the safety and antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide, a new reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, and imipramine in the treatment of dysthymia (DSM-III-R). A total of 315 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment in one of three groups (moclobemide, imipramine and placebo). Patients were male or female outpatients aged between 18 and 65 years meeting DSM-III-R criteria for dysthymia, primary type, with late or early onset. Of the patients in each group 85% completed the 8-week treatment period. The percentage of patients who no longer fulfilled DSM-III-R symptom criteria at treatment endpoint was significantly higher in the moclobemide (60%) and imipramine (49%) treatment groups than in the placebo group (22%). Differences to placebo were also statistically significant both for moclobemide and for imipramine on the other efficacy variables (i.e. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, final overall efficacy assessment, Clinical Global Impression and symptom check list self-rating). A significant superiority of moclobemide and imipramine over placebo was found in pure dysthymia and in double-depression, as well as in early and late onset subgroups. In early onset cases, moclobemide was significantly more effective than was imipramine on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Anticholinergic symptoms and sleepiness were significantly more frequent side effects on imipramine than on moclobemide or on placebo, and the investigators' final overall assessment of tolerability significantly favoured moclobemide over imipramine. This study demonstrates the efficacy of high dose moclobemide (mean dose 675 mg/day) and high dose imipramine (220 mg/day) against placebo in the treatment of dysthymia. Moclobemide was better tolerated than was imipramine.
开展了一项国际多中心、安慰剂对照研究,以确定新型单胺氧化酶A可逆抑制剂吗氯贝胺和丙咪嗪治疗恶劣心境障碍(DSM-III-R)的安全性和抗抑郁疗效。共纳入315例患者,随机分为三组(吗氯贝胺组、丙咪嗪组和安慰剂组)之一,接受为期8周的治疗。患者为年龄在18至65岁之间、符合DSM-III-R恶劣心境障碍原发性类型、早发或晚发标准的门诊男女患者。每组中85%的患者完成了8周的治疗期。在治疗终点不再符合DSM-III-R症状标准的患者百分比,吗氯贝胺治疗组(60%)和丙咪嗪治疗组(49%)显著高于安慰剂组(22%)。在其他疗效变量(即汉密尔顿抑郁量表、最终总体疗效评估、临床总体印象和症状自评清单)方面,吗氯贝胺和丙咪嗪与安慰剂的差异也具有统计学意义。在单纯恶劣心境障碍、双重抑郁以及早发和晚发亚组中,发现吗氯贝胺和丙咪嗪均显著优于安慰剂。在早发病例中,吗氯贝胺在汉密尔顿抑郁量表上的疗效显著优于丙咪嗪。与吗氯贝胺或安慰剂相比,丙咪嗪的抗胆碱能症状和嗜睡等副作用明显更常见,研究者对耐受性的最终总体评估明显更倾向于吗氯贝胺而非丙咪嗪。本研究证明了高剂量吗氯贝胺(平均剂量675毫克/天)和高剂量丙咪嗪(220毫克/天)治疗恶劣心境障碍时相对于安慰剂的疗效。吗氯贝胺的耐受性优于丙咪嗪。