McMahon F J, Stine O C, Chase G A, Meyers D A, Simpson S G, DePaulo J R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287-7381.
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;151(2):210-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.2.210.
The authors analyzed data from a family sample ascertained for a genetic linkage study of bipolar disorder to address the following questions: Do the major clinical subtypes of familial affective disorder have distinct distributions of age at onset? What factors other than clinical subtype affect these distributions? After controlling for these factors, do the differences in age at onset persist among the subtypes?
Eighty-two families were ascertained through a treated proband with bipolar disorder who had a family history of two or more affected siblings or one affected sibling and one affected parent. After participating in an interview conducted by a psychiatrist using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia--Lifetime Version, 274 probands and their first-degree relatives were diagnosed as having bipolar I, bipolar II, or recurrent unipolar disorder according to Research Diagnostic Criteria. Age at first major affective episode and other clinical data were collected.
Onset age distributions were similar for bipolar I and bipolar II disorder but significantly different for recurrent unipolar disorder. This finding persisted after adjustment for a significantly earlier onset among females. Subjects with affective disorder in both parental lines (bilineal) also experienced a significantly earlier onset. Substance abuse, physical illness, and sex of the affected parent had no significant impact on onset age.
Although differences in age at onset may reflect several factors, these results provide indirect support for the view that bipolar I and bipolar II disorders are genetically related phenotypes and suggest that bilineal families may be more complex than previously assumed.
作者分析了一个为双相情感障碍基因连锁研究而确定的家族样本数据,以解决以下问题:家族性情感障碍的主要临床亚型在发病年龄上是否有不同的分布?除临床亚型外,还有哪些因素影响这些分布?在控制这些因素后,各亚型之间的发病年龄差异是否仍然存在?
通过一名患有双相情感障碍且有两个或更多患病兄弟姐妹或一个患病兄弟姐妹和一个患病父母家族史的先证者确诊了82个家族。在参与了一位精神科医生使用《情感障碍与精神分裂症日程表——终生版》进行的访谈后,根据研究诊断标准,274名先证者及其一级亲属被诊断为患有I型双相情感障碍、II型双相情感障碍或复发性单相障碍。收集了首次出现主要情感发作的年龄及其他临床数据。
I型双相情感障碍和II型双相情感障碍的发病年龄分布相似,但复发性单相障碍的发病年龄分布有显著差异。在对女性发病明显较早进行调整后,这一发现仍然存在。双亲均患有情感障碍(双亲遗传)的受试者发病也明显较早。药物滥用、身体疾病以及患病父母的性别对发病年龄没有显著影响。
尽管发病年龄的差异可能反映了多种因素,但这些结果为I型双相情感障碍和II型双相情感障碍是基因相关表型这一观点提供了间接支持,并表明双亲遗传的家族可能比之前认为的更为复杂。