Talwar D, Jindal S K
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education And Research, Chandigarh.
J Assoc Physicians India. 1993 May;41(5):279-80.
Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was studied in 23 stable asthmatics before and after nifedipine and diltiazem. There was no significant bronchodilatory effect of either calcium channel antagonists. The mean provocative dose of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 = 0.157 +/- 0.74 mg) was not altered by nifedipine (PC20 = 0.159 +/- 0.61). However, diltiazem offered significant protection. The mean ratio of PC20 after diltiazem over baseline was 3.27 +/- 3.55. The results suggest that although both calcium channel antagonists have no influence on normal basal bronchomotor tone, diltiazem does significantly protect against cholinergic stimulation.
在23名病情稳定的哮喘患者中,研究了硝苯地平和地尔硫䓬治疗前后支气管对乙酰甲胆碱的反应性。两种钙通道拮抗剂均未产生明显的支气管扩张作用。使第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降20%所需的乙酰甲胆碱平均激发剂量(PC20 = 0.157±0.74毫克),硝苯地平治疗后未改变(PC20 = 0.159±0.61)。然而,地尔硫䓬提供了显著的保护作用。地尔硫䓬治疗后PC20与基线的平均比值为3.27±3.55。结果表明,虽然两种钙通道拮抗剂对正常基础支气管运动张力均无影响,但地尔硫䓬确实能显著抵御胆碱能刺激。