Teasell R W, Shapiro A P
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;73(1):44-50.
Chronic nonorganic motor disorders pose particular difficulties because of a combination of diagnostic confusion and intractability to psychotherapeutic or behavioral interventions. Three cases are presented, all of whom failed a rehabilitation approach that emphasized basic behavioral principles of shaping and reinforcement. Despite this initial failure, all three patients showed dramatic and rapid improvement after implementation of an intervention combing elements of strategic and behavior therapy. The strategic element consisted of placing patients in a double bind by telling them full recovery constituted proof of an organic etiology and failure to recovery constituted conclusive evidence of a nonorganic or psychiatric etiology. These cases also illustrate the difficulty in distinguishing between conversion and factitious disorders.
慢性非器质性运动障碍由于诊断混淆以及对心理治疗或行为干预难以处理而带来特殊困难。本文介绍了三例患者,他们均未能从强调塑造和强化等基本行为原则的康复方法中获益。尽管最初失败了,但在实施结合了策略性治疗和行为治疗要素的干预措施后,所有三名患者均迅速出现了显著改善。策略性要素包括通过告知患者完全康复构成器质性病因的证据,而未能康复则构成非器质性或精神病因的确凿证据,从而使患者陷入两难境地。这些病例还说明了区分转换障碍和做作性障碍的困难。