Hurwicz M L, Berkanovic E
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, St. Louis 63121-4499.
J Rheumatol. 1993 Nov;20(11):1836-44.
To evaluate the Stress Process Model proposed by Pearlin and colleagues by examining the role of personal and social resources in mediating the relationship between the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) related stressors of functional disability, pain, and flares, and the outcome of depressive symptoms.
Data are from 285 patients who participated in a study of the natural history of RA, comorbidity and depression. Measures include the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale Functioning and Pain scales, the Lubben Social Network scale, and items indicating sociodemographic status, health status and personal resources. A series of hierarchical regression analyses with multiplicative interaction terms were conducted.
Substantial consistency between the Stress Process Model and relationships observed in the data was demonstrated.
Although no claim is made to having demonstrated that the observed relationships are causal, the fact that the data are consistent with the model invites a prospective analysis in which the ordering of the variables over time can be established unambiguously. Because of the implications of the Stress Process Model for the design of psychosocial interventions, such a test is especially important.
通过考察个人资源和社会资源在调节类风湿性关节炎(RA)相关应激源(功能残疾、疼痛和病情发作)与抑郁症状结局之间关系中的作用,来评估Pearlin及其同事提出的应激过程模型。
数据来自285名参与RA自然史、合并症和抑郁症研究的患者。测量指标包括流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、关节炎影响测量量表功能和疼痛量表、Lubben社会网络量表,以及表明社会人口统计学状况、健康状况和个人资源的项目。进行了一系列带有乘法交互项的分层回归分析。
应激过程模型与数据中观察到的关系之间存在高度一致性。
虽然并未声称已证明观察到的关系具有因果性,但数据与该模型一致这一事实促使进行前瞻性分析,在该分析中可以明确确定变量随时间的顺序。由于应激过程模型对心理社会干预设计具有启示意义,这样的检验尤为重要。