McKenney J M, Proctor J D, Harris S, Chinchili V M
School of Pharmacy, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298.
JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):672-7.
To compare escalating doses of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (SR) niacin for effectiveness in reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides and increasing levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and for the occurrence of adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity.
Randomized, double-blind, parallel comparison of IR and SR niacin administered sequentially at 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 3000 mg/d, each for 6 weeks.
Cholesterol research center.
Forty-six adults, 23 in each group, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) after 1 month of a step 1 National Cholesterol Education Program diet.
Fourteen-hour fasting lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol levels, results of clinical laboratory tests, a symptom questionnaire, and withdrawal rates.
The SR niacin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly more than IR niacin did at the dosage of 1500 mg/d and above, while IR niacin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly more than SR niacin did at all dosage levels. The reduction in triglyceride levels was similar with IR and SR niacin. Nine (39%) of the 23 patients assigned to the IR dosage form withdrew before completing the 3000-mg daily dose; the most common reasons for withdrawal were vasodilatory symptoms, fatigue, and acanthosis nigricans. Eighteen (78%) of the 23 patients assigned to the SR dosage form withdrew before completing the 3000-mg daily dose; the most common reasons for withdrawal were gastrointestinal tract symptoms, fatigue, and increases in levels of liver aminotransferases, often with symptoms of hepatic dysfunction. None of the patients taking IR niacin developed hepatotoxic effects, while 12 (52%) of the 23 patients taking SR niacin did.
The SR form of niacin is hepatotoxic and should be restricted from use. The IR niacin is preferred for the management of hypercholesterolemia but can also cause significant adverse effects and should be given only to patients who can be carefully monitored by experienced health professionals.
比较递增剂量的速释型(IR)和缓释型(SR)烟酸在降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯水平以及提高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平方面的有效性,以及不良反应的发生情况,尤其是肝毒性。
随机、双盲、平行比较,将IR和SR烟酸依次按500、1000、1500、2000和3000mg/d给药,各给药6周。
胆固醇研究中心。
46名成年人,每组23名,在接受为期1个月的美国国家胆固醇教育计划第一步饮食后,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平大于4.14mmol/L(160mg/dL)。
14小时空腹血脂和脂蛋白胆固醇水平、临床实验室检查结果、症状问卷以及停药率。
在1500mg/d及以上剂量时,SR烟酸降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的效果显著优于IR烟酸,而在所有剂量水平下,IR烟酸提高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的效果显著优于SR烟酸。IR和SR烟酸降低甘油三酯水平的效果相似。在分配到IR剂型的23名患者中,有9名(39%)在完成3000mg/d的每日剂量前停药;最常见的停药原因是血管舒张症状、疲劳和黑棘皮病。在分配到SR剂型的23名患者中,有18名(78%)在完成3000mg/d的每日剂量前停药;最常见的停药原因是胃肠道症状、疲劳以及肝转氨酶水平升高,常伴有肝功能障碍症状。服用IR烟酸的患者均未出现肝毒性作用,而服用SR烟酸的23名患者中有12名(52%)出现了肝毒性作用。
SR型烟酸具有肝毒性,应限制使用。IR型烟酸是治疗高胆固醇血症的首选药物,但也会引起显著的不良反应,仅应给予能够由经验丰富的卫生专业人员进行密切监测的患者。