• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普萘洛尔引起目标咬击攻击增加。

Propranolol-induced increases in target-biting attack.

作者信息

Matray-Devoti J, Wagner G C

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, State University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993 Dec;46(4):923-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90223-g.

DOI:10.1016/0091-3057(93)90223-g
PMID:8309973
Abstract

The effect of a beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent on defensive aggression in mice was evaluated. Acute doses of d,l-propranolol (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, and 12.8 mg/kg) were administered to male Rockland-Swiss mice prior to testing in a target-biting paradigm. Baseline conditions established a high target-biting rate low biting rate during a 15-s tone stimulus preceding the next shock. Every dose of propranolol increased target-biting rates above baseline during each interval with one exception: 0.4 mg/kg decreased the biting rate immediately after delivery of the tail shock. The overall increase in aggression observed following dosing with propranolol was not expected from a review of the clinical literature. These results are discussed in reference to propranolol's known effects on the brain serotoninergic systems and the use of an animal model of defensive aggression.

摘要

评估了一种β-肾上腺素能受体阻断剂对小鼠防御性攻击行为的影响。在采用目标咬啮范式进行测试之前,对雄性罗克兰-瑞士小鼠给予急性剂量的消旋普萘洛尔(0.2、0.4、0.8、1.6、3.2、6.4和12.8毫克/千克)。基线条件确定在下一次电击前15秒的纯音刺激期间目标咬啮率高、咬啮率低。除了0.4毫克/千克在尾部电击后立即降低咬啮率外,每剂普萘洛尔在每个间隔期间均使目标咬啮率高于基线水平。从临床文献回顾来看,服用普萘洛尔后观察到的攻击性总体增加是出乎意料的。参照普萘洛尔对大脑5-羟色胺能系统的已知作用以及防御性攻击的动物模型的使用对这些结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Propranolol-induced increases in target-biting attack.普萘洛尔引起目标咬击攻击增加。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993 Dec;46(4):923-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90223-g.
2
Effects of nicotine on target biting and resident-intruder attack.尼古丁对目标撕咬和定居者-入侵者攻击行为的影响。
Life Sci. 2003 Jun 6;73(3):311-7. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00289-3.
3
Effects of fluprazine (DU27716) and ethanol on target biting behavior and intruder-evoked attacks.氟哌嗪(DU27716)和乙醇对目标撕咬行为及入侵者诱发攻击的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;91(2):193-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00217061.
4
Mice increased target biting behaviors 24h after co-administration of alcohol and fluoxetine.
Brain Res. 2017 May 1;1662:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
5
The effects of repeated administration of fluprazine on target biting and intruder-evoked attacks.反复给予氟丙嗪对目标撕咬和入侵者诱发攻击的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95(4):476-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00172958.
6
Effects of monoaminergic agonists on alcohol-induced increases in mouse aggression.单胺能激动剂对酒精诱导的小鼠攻击性增加的影响。
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1993 Sep;11:185-91. doi: 10.15288/jsas.1993.s11.185.
7
Involvement of brain transmitters in the modulation of shock-induced aggression in rats by propranolol and related drugs.脑内递质在普萘洛尔及相关药物对大鼠休克诱导攻击行为的调节中的作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987 Feb;26(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90110-9.
8
Effects of d,1-propranolol and haloperidol on aggressive behavior induced in mice by isolation and isolation plus amphetamine treatment.右旋-左旋普萘洛尔和氟哌啶醇对隔离及隔离加苯丙胺处理诱导的小鼠攻击行为的影响。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1986;19(3):411-7.
9
Effects of ethanol on murine aggression assessed by biting of an inanimate target.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;83(3):268-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00464792.
10
Role of the adrenergic system in a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy: antiangiogenic effects of beta-adrenoreceptor blockade.肾上腺素能系统在氧诱导的视网膜病变小鼠模型中的作用:β肾上腺素能受体阻断的抗血管生成作用。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 5;52(1):155-70. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5536.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal defense is modulated by beta adrenergic receptors in lateral septum in mice.小鼠外侧隔区的β-肾上腺素能受体调节母体防御。
Behav Neurosci. 2011 Jun;125(3):434-45. doi: 10.1037/a0023184.