• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

派对还未结束:机构在留住公共儿童福利社工方面的作用。

The party isn't over: the agency role in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers.

作者信息

Rycraft J R

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61801.

出版信息

Soc Work. 1994 Jan;39(1):75-80.

PMID:8310324
Abstract

Nationwide, social services agencies continue to report difficulties in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers. As service demands placed on the child welfare system continue to increase, the need for an experienced and competent work force becomes imperative. Previous studies have identified the reasons for the high turnover rate among child welfare caseworkers. This article reports the findings of an exploratory study to identify factors that may influence some caseworkers to continue employment in public child welfare when so many others are leaving. From comprehensive focused interviews with 23 caseworkers, the following four factors of retention emerged: (1) mission, (2) goodness of fit, (3) supervision, and (4) investment. The importance of the relationship with the agency and the four factors in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers is discussed.

摘要

在全国范围内,社会服务机构持续报告称,在挽留公共儿童福利工作者方面存在困难。随着儿童福利系统面临的服务需求不断增加,拥有一支经验丰富且能力胜任的劳动力队伍变得至关重要。此前的研究已明确了儿童福利工作者高离职率的原因。本文报告了一项探索性研究的结果,以确定在众多人离职的情况下,可能影响一些工作者继续留在公共儿童福利领域工作的因素。通过对23名工作者进行全面深入的访谈,得出了以下四个留任意愿因素:(1)使命,(2)契合度,(3)监督,以及(4)投入。本文还讨论了与机构的关系以及这四个因素在挽留公共儿童福利工作者方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
The party isn't over: the agency role in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers.派对还未结束:机构在留住公共儿童福利社工方面的作用。
Soc Work. 1994 Jan;39(1):75-80.
2
Predictors of undesired turnover for child welfare workers.儿童福利工作者意外离职的预测因素。
Child Welfare. 2009;88(5):187-208.
3
Child welfare workers: who they are and how they view the child welfare system.儿童福利工作者:他们是谁以及他们如何看待儿童福利系统。
Child Welfare. 2006 Jan-Feb;85(1):83-103.
4
The climate of child welfare employee retention.儿童福利员工留用的环境
Child Welfare. 2008;87(1):91-114.
5
Factors influencing the retention of specially educated public child welfare workers.影响受过特殊教育的公共儿童福利工作者留任的因素。
J Health Soc Policy. 2002;15(3-4):89-103. doi: 10.1300/J045v15n03_07.
6
Child welfare employee recruitment and retention: an organizational culture perspective.儿童福利机构员工的招聘与留用:组织文化视角
Child Welfare. 2009;88(6):81-104.
7
Male social workers in child welfare: a qualitative analysis.
Child Welfare. 2009;88(4):113-33.
8
Improving the retention of child welfare workers by strengthening skills and increasing support for supervisors.通过强化技能和增加对主管的支持来提高儿童福利工作者的留任率。
Child Welfare. 2009;88(5):109-27.
9
A follow-up of a Title IV-E program's graduates' retention rates in a public child welfare agency.对一项《第IV-E类项目》毕业生在一家公共儿童福利机构的留用率的跟踪调查。
J Health Soc Policy. 2002;15(3-4):39-51. doi: 10.1300/J045v15n03_04.
10
Realistic job previews in child welfare: state of innovation and practice.儿童福利领域的现实工作预览:创新与实践状况
Child Welfare. 2009;88(5):23-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Residential childcare worker perceptions of work-related achievement and pride.寄宿制儿童护理工作者对与工作相关的成就和自豪感的看法。
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 25;3:1360365. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1360365. eCollection 2024.
2
From Chaos to Normalization and Deconfinement: What did the Pandemic Unveil in Youth Residential Care.从混乱到规范化与解除限制:疫情在青少年寄宿照料机构中揭示了什么。
Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2022 Jan 22:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10560-021-00808-2.
3
The Changing Educators' Work Environment in Contemporary Society.
当代社会中不断变化的教育工作者工作环境。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02186. eCollection 2018.
4
The Compassion Fatigue Scale: Its Use With Social Workers Following Urban Disaster.同情疲劳量表:在城市灾难后对社会工作者的应用。
Res Soc Work Pract. 2008 May;18(3):238-250. doi: 10.1177/1049731507310190.