Hackman R C, Wolford J L, Gleaves C A, Myerson D, Beauchamp M D, Meyers J D, McDonald G B
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Transplantation. 1994 Jan;57(2):231-7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199401001-00014.
This is a retrospective study of 54 consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in marrow graft recipients performed to determine the incidence and distribution of CMV infection in symptomatic patients and to compare the sensitivities of 7 CMV detection techniques. At each endoscopy, 3 biopsies were obtained from the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. Each of the 3 biopsies was assayed for CMV by different techniques. Enteric CMV was identified by one or more techniques in 52 of 486 (11%) biopsies from 14 infected patients. All patients infected with CMV initially had nausea and vomiting. In 13 of these patients, there was esophageal CMV, often associated with stomach (10 patients) and duodenal (7 patients) involvement. CMV infection of the esophagus was never identified cytologically in esophageal imprints or histologically, immunohistologically, or by DNA hybridization in esophageal epithelial cells. The most sensitive diagnostic methods were conventional and centrifugation cultures, which each identified CMV in 17 of the 30 (57%) organs positive by any technique. Indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) staining for a late CMV antigen detected 53%, followed by in situ DNA hybridization (40%), IFA and immunoperoxidase (IP) staining for an early CMV antigen (37% and 43%), and routine histology (30%). Although no single detection technique is completely adequate for the rapid identification of CMV in small endoscopic biopsies, centrifugation culture is the method of choice, with supplementary immunohistology and in situ hybridization of archival tissue if needed.
这是一项对骨髓移植受者连续进行54例上消化道内镜检查的回顾性研究,目的是确定有症状患者中巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的发生率和分布情况,并比较7种CMV检测技术的敏感性。每次内镜检查时,从食管、胃和十二指肠获取3块活检组织。这3块活检组织中的每一块都采用不同技术检测CMV。在来自14例感染患者的486块活检组织中,有52块(11%)通过一种或多种技术检测出肠道CMV。所有最初感染CMV的患者均有恶心和呕吐症状。其中13例患者存在食管CMV感染,常伴有胃部(10例患者)和十二指肠(7例患者)受累。在食管压片的细胞学检查中,或在食管上皮细胞的组织学、免疫组织学或DNA杂交检查中,从未发现食管CMV感染。最敏感的诊断方法是常规培养和离心培养,在通过任何技术检测为阳性的30个器官中,每种方法均在17个(57%)器官中检测出CMV。针对CMV晚期抗原的间接荧光抗体(IFA)染色检测出53%,其次是原位DNA杂交(40%)、针对CMV早期抗原的IFA和免疫过氧化物酶(IP)染色(分别为37%和43%),以及常规组织学检查(30%)。虽然没有一种单一的检测技术足以在小型内镜活检中快速鉴定CMV,但离心培养是首选方法,如有需要,可对存档组织进行补充免疫组织学和原位杂交检查。