Woods M S, Traverso L W, Kozarek R A, Tsao J, Rossi R L, Gough D, Donohue J H
Wichita Clinic, Kansas.
Am J Surg. 1994 Jan;167(1):27-33; discussion 33-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90050-7.
We collected the records of 81 patients with biliary tract injuries occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) who were referred to 3 referral centers during a 33-month (May 1990 to March 1993) period. All records were reviewed to provide data concerning the anatomy of the lesion induced, method of injury, timing of injury detection, role of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), methods of treatment, and outcome of these injuries. Injuries were classified by our own method as follows: (1) cystic duct leaks (n = 15), (2) bile leaks and/or ductal strictures (n = 27), and (3) ductal transections or excisions (n = 39). Peak occurrence by quarter of the year was 4th quarter, 1990 (Lahey), and 3rd quarter, 1991 (Mason), and 1st quarter, 1992 (Mayo). The majority (62%) of the injuries were recognized after LC. At the time of LC, 31 of 81 (38%) injuries were recognized and converted to open procedures. Data regarding IOC were available in 63 of 81 (78%) cases. In patients in whom IOC was not performed, 14 of 38 (37%) operations were converted; if an IOC was obtained and interpreted correctly, 13 of 21 (62%) operations were converted. Primary repair was attempted in 11 leaks and/or strictures, but 36% required additional treatment. Primary repair was used in six transections or excisions, and 17% have required further intervention. In patients who had biliary-enteric bypass (BEB) performed outside (17) versus at the referral institution (29), 94% (16 patients) versus 0%, respectively, required additional operative (e.g., revision of a hepaticojejunostomy) or nonoperative (e.g., radiologic or endoscopic stenting or balloon dilation) procedures. When used as initial therapy or after a primary ductal repair, stents (with or without balloon dilation) resolved 100% of simple cystic duct leaks and 91% of leaks and/or strictures. In conclusion, the peak incidence of LC-related biliary injuries appears to have passed. A completed and correctly interpreted IOC increases the chance of detection of biliary injuries intraoperatively and should assist surgeons who use routine IOC. Nonsurgical techniques allow treatment of most simple cystic duct leaks, major ductal leaks and/or strictures, and postoperative BEB strictures, although follow-up is limited. The poor results of pre-referral BEB is not surprising since all of these patients were selected for referral because their treatments had not been successful.
我们收集了81例在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)过程中发生胆道损伤患者的记录,这些患者在33个月(1990年5月至1993年3月)期间被转诊至3个转诊中心。对所有记录进行了审查,以提供有关所致损伤的解剖结构、损伤方法、损伤发现时间、术中胆管造影(IOC)的作用、治疗方法以及这些损伤的结果的数据。损伤按我们自己的方法分类如下:(1)胆囊管漏(n = 15),(2)胆漏和/或胆管狭窄(n = 27),以及(3)胆管横断或切除(n = 39)。按年份季度统计的发病高峰分别为1990年第四季度(拉希诊所)、1991年第三季度(梅森诊所)和1992年第一季度(梅奥诊所)。大多数(62%)损伤在LC术后被识别。在LC时,81例中有31例(38%)损伤被识别并转为开放手术。81例中有63例(78%)可获得有关IOC的数据。在未进行IOC的患者中,38例中有14例(37%)手术被转为开放手术;如果进行了IOC且解释正确,21例中有13例(62%)手术被转为开放手术。对11例漏和/或狭窄尝试进行了一期修复,但36%需要额外治疗。对6例横断或切除进行了一期修复,17%需要进一步干预。在院外(17例)与转诊机构(29例)进行胆肠吻合术(BEB)的患者中,分别有94%(16例患者)与0%需要额外的手术(如肝空肠吻合术的修正)或非手术(如放射学或内镜支架置入或球囊扩张)治疗。当用作初始治疗或在胆管一期修复后,支架(有或无球囊扩张)使100%的单纯胆囊管漏和91%的漏和/或狭窄得到解决。总之,LC相关胆道损伤的发病率高峰似乎已经过去。完整且解释正确的IOC增加了术中发现胆道损伤的机会,应有助于使用常规IOC的外科医生。非手术技术可治疗大多数单纯胆囊管漏、主要胆管漏和/或狭窄以及术后BEB狭窄,尽管随访有限。转诊前BEB效果不佳并不奇怪,因为所有这些患者都是因治疗未成功而被选来转诊的。