Chang K C, Chiang C W, Kuo C T, Lee C B, Hsu T S, Lee Y S
Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1993 Dec;16(4):217-22.
Traditional Doppler pressure half-time (T1/2) method (mitral valve area = 220/T1/2) is widely used for evaluating the mitral orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis (MS). However, the effect of mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR) on the calculation of the mitral valve area by this method is still controversial. Therefore, we examined 493 consecutive patients with MS to evaluate the effect of MR and AR on Doppler-derived mitral orifice area. The mitral orifice area planimetered from two-dimensional echocardiogram was used as the standard reference. Excluding 16 patients with either unsatisfactory Doppler or echocardiographic tracings, 477 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 162 males and 315 females with a mean age of 49 years. They were divided into 4 groups: group A, 327 patients with MS but no MR and AR; group B, 68 patients with MS + MR but no AR; group C, 64 patients with MS + AR but no MR; group D, 18 patients with MS + MR + AR. The differences between echo and Doppler area were 0.02 +/- 0.02 cm2 (mean +/- SE), p = 0.220, in group A; 0.13 +/- 0.04 cm2, p = 0.004, in group B; 0.11 +/- 0.05 cm2, p = 0.026 in group C; and 0.31 +/- 0.08 cm2, p = 0.001, in group D. Thus, in patients with MS, the associated MR or AR may invalidate the pressure half-time method for the derivation of mitral valve area.
传统的多普勒压力半衰期(T1/2)法(二尖瓣面积 = 220/T1/2)被广泛用于评估二尖瓣狭窄(MS)患者的二尖瓣口面积。然而,二尖瓣反流(MR)和主动脉瓣反流(AR)对该方法计算二尖瓣面积的影响仍存在争议。因此,我们对493例连续的MS患者进行了检查,以评估MR和AR对多普勒衍生二尖瓣口面积的影响。将二维超声心动图测量的二尖瓣口面积用作标准参考。排除16例多普勒或超声心动图记录不令人满意的患者后,477例患者纳入研究。其中男性162例,女性315例,平均年龄49岁。他们被分为4组:A组,327例MS患者但无MR和AR;B组,68例MS + MR但无AR的患者;C组,64例MS + AR但无MR的患者;D组,18例MS + MR + AR的患者。A组回声与多普勒面积的差异为0.02±0.02 cm2(均值±标准误),p = 0.220;B组为0.13±0.04 cm2,p = 0.004;C组为0.11±0.05 cm2,p = 0.026;D组为0.31±0.08 cm2,p = 0.001。因此,在MS患者中,合并的MR或AR可能使压力半衰期法推导二尖瓣面积无效。