Carlyon R P, Beveridge H A
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, England.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2886-95. doi: 10.1121/1.405808.
A series of experiments investigated the deterioration in intensity discrimination at intermediate levels caused by preceding the brief sinusoidal stimuli by an intense narrow-band noise [Zeng et al., Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)]. Experiment 1 showed that this deterioration acted in a roughly additive manner with the previously reported midlevel deterioration for the intensity discrimination of brief 6500-Hz tones in quiet. The experiment also showed that a smaller, although still substantial, deterioration occurred for the detection of brief tones in bursts of synchronous noise. In experiment 2, the masker could occur either before the signal (louder tone) or standard (softer tone), the choice being selected at random on a trial-by-trial basis, and with the Weber fraction tracked for each condition separately using two interleaved, adaptive procedures. Weber fractions were lower when the masker preceded the signal than when it preceded the standard, arguing against a major role for adaptation in causing the midlevel deterioration. Instead, it is suggested that the deterioration shared a common mechanism with the phenomenon of "loudness enhancement" [R. J. Irwin and J. J. Zwislocki, Percept. Psychophys. 10, 189-192 (1971); Galambos et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1127-1130 (1972)]. The third experiment showed that Weber fractions did not depend greatly on whether the forward masker occurred only in interval one or only in interval two of a two-interval trial. A fourth experiment investigated the effect of a forward masker on frequency difference limens (DLs). When the masker was presented in both intervals of each trial, there was only a moderate increase in frequency DLs which, in contrast to the elevation in Weber fractions for intensity discrimination, was independent of signal level. Presenting the masker before only the lower frequency tone of a pair to be discriminated usually yielded lower DLs than presenting it only before the higher frequency tone, but this effect was less consistent than for intensity discrimination. The results of all experiments are discussed with respect to the various ways in which an intense narrow-band masker can affect the perception of subsequent brief sounds.
一系列实验研究了在短暂正弦刺激之前呈现强烈窄带噪声所导致的中等强度水平下强度辨别能力的下降[曾等人,《听觉研究》55,223 - 230(1991)]。实验1表明,这种下降与先前报道的在安静环境中对短暂6500赫兹纯音强度辨别的中等强度水平下降大致呈相加作用。该实验还表明,在同步噪声脉冲中检测短暂纯音时,虽然下降幅度较小,但仍然显著。在实验2中,掩蔽音可以出现在信号(较响纯音)之前或标准音(较柔和纯音)之前,每次试验随机选择,并且使用两种交错的自适应程序分别跟踪每种情况下的韦伯分数。当掩蔽音先于信号出现时,韦伯分数低于其先于标准音出现时,这表明适应在导致中等强度水平下降方面不起主要作用。相反,有人认为这种下降与“响度增强”现象[R. J. 欧文和J. J. 兹维兹洛斯基,《感知与心理物理学》10,189 - 192(1971);加兰博斯等人,《美国声学学会杂志》52,1127 - 1130(1972)]有共同的机制。第三个实验表明,韦伯分数在很大程度上并不取决于前向掩蔽音是仅出现在双间隔试验的间隔1中还是仅出现在间隔2中。第四个实验研究了前向掩蔽音对频率辨别阈限(DLs)的影响。当在每次试验的两个间隔中都呈现掩蔽音时,频率DLs仅适度增加,与强度辨别中韦伯分数的升高不同,它与信号水平无关。仅在要辨别的一对纯音中较低频率的纯音之前呈现掩蔽音,通常比仅在较高频率的纯音之前呈现掩蔽音产生的DLs更低,但这种效应不如强度辨别那样一致。所有实验的结果都围绕强烈窄带掩蔽音影响后续短暂声音感知的各种方式进行了讨论。