• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于创伤质量保证的生存概率评分新方法。

A new approach to probability of survival scoring for trauma quality assurance.

作者信息

McGonigal M D, Cole J, Schwab C W, Kauder D R, Rotondo M F, Angood P B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia 19104.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Jun;34(6):863-8; discussion 868-70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199306000-00018.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199306000-00018
PMID:8315682
Abstract

This study examined the application of an artificial intelligence technique, the neural network (NET), in predicting probability of survival (Ps) for patients with penetrating trauma. A NET is a computer construct that can detect complex patterns within a data set. A NET must be "trained" by supplying a series of input patterns and the corresponding expected output (e.g., survival). Once trained, the NET can recall the proper outputs for a specific set of inputs. It can also extrapolate correct outputs for patterns never before encountered. A neural network was trained on Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, age, and survival data contained in 3500 of 8300 state registry records of all patients with penetrating trauma reported in Pennsylvania from 1987 through 1990. The remaining 4800 records were analyzed by TRISS, ASCOT, and the trained NET. Sensitivity (accuracy of predicting death) and specificity (accuracy of predicting survival) were 0.840 and 0.985 for TRISS, 0.842 and 0.985 for ASCOT, and 0.904 and 0.972 for the neural network. This represents a decrease in the number of improperly classified ("unexpected") deaths, from 73 for TRISS and 72 for ASCOT, to 44 for the neural network. The increased sensitivity was statistically significant by Chi-square analysis. The NET for penetrating trauma provided a more sensitive but less specific technique for calculating Ps than did either TRISS or ASCOT. This translated into a 40% reduction in the number of deaths requiring review, and the potential for more efficient use of quality assurance resources.

摘要

本研究探讨了一种人工智能技术——神经网络(NET)在预测穿透性创伤患者生存概率(Ps)方面的应用。神经网络是一种计算机结构,能够检测数据集中的复杂模式。必须通过提供一系列输入模式和相应的预期输出(例如生存情况)来“训练”神经网络。一旦经过训练,神经网络就能为特定的一组输入调出正确的输出。它还能对从未遇到过的模式推断出正确的输出。利用1987年至1990年宾夕法尼亚州报告的8300例穿透性创伤患者的州登记记录中的3500例患者的修正创伤评分、损伤严重程度评分、年龄和生存数据对神经网络进行了训练。其余4800条记录由TRISS、ASCOT和经过训练的神经网络进行分析。TRISS的灵敏度(预测死亡的准确性)和特异性(预测生存的准确性)分别为0.840和0.985,ASCOT为0.842和0.985,神经网络为0.904和0.972。这意味着错误分类(“意外”)死亡的数量从TRISS的73例和ASCOT的72例减少到神经网络的44例。通过卡方分析,灵敏度的提高具有统计学意义。与TRISS或ASCOT相比,用于穿透性创伤的神经网络在计算Ps方面提供了一种更灵敏但特异性较低的技术。这使得需要复查的死亡人数减少了40%,并有可能更有效地利用质量保证资源。

相似文献

1
A new approach to probability of survival scoring for trauma quality assurance.一种用于创伤质量保证的生存概率评分新方法。
J Trauma. 1993 Jun;34(6):863-8; discussion 868-70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199306000-00018.
2
Comparison between TRISS and ASCOT methods in controlling for injury severity.创伤严重度评分(TRISS)法与创伤严重度特征评分(ASCOT)法在控制损伤严重程度方面的比较。
J Trauma. 1992 Aug;33(2):326-32. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199208000-00025.
3
A comparison of neural networks for computing predicted probability of survival for trauma victims.用于计算创伤受害者生存预测概率的神经网络比较。
W V Med J. 2005 May-Jun;101(3):120-5.
4
Injury severity and probability of survival assessment in trauma patients using a predictive hierarchical network model derived from ICD-9 codes.使用从ICD - 9编码派生的预测分层网络模型评估创伤患者的损伤严重程度和生存概率。
J Trauma. 1995 Apr;38(4):590-7; discussion 597-601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199504000-00022.
5
Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.创伤严重程度特征化评分(ASCOT)相较于创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)的预测改进:一项独立评估结果
J Trauma. 1996 Jan;40(1):42-8; discussion 48-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199601000-00009.
6
Has TRISS become an anachronism? A comparison of mortality between the National Trauma Data Bank and Major Trauma Outcome Study databases.TRISS 是否已经过时?国家创伤数据库与重大创伤结局研究数据库之间死亡率的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):326-31; discussion 331. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a7758.
7
A new method for estimating probability of survival in pediatric patients using revised TRISS methodology based on age-adjusted weights.一种基于年龄调整权重的改良TRISS方法来估计儿科患者生存概率的新方法。
J Trauma. 2002 Feb;52(2):235-41. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200202000-00006.
8
Use of scene vital signs improves TRISS predicted survival in intubated trauma patients.使用现场生命体征可改善气管插管创伤患者的TRISS预测生存率。
J Surg Res. 2009 Jun 1;154(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 May 6.
9
The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay.损伤严重度评分(ISS)与创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)的终结:ICISS,一种基于国际疾病分类第九版的预测工具,在预测创伤患者的生存率、住院费用和住院时间方面优于ISS和TRISS。
J Trauma. 1998 Jan;44(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199801000-00003.
10
[Comparison between of TRISS and ASCOT methods--in Tainan area. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. A Severity Characterization of Trauma].
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1996 Dec;12(12):691-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of an artificial neural network in the evaluation of the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as a treatment of choice for urinary lithiasis.人工神经网络在评估体外冲击波碎石术作为尿路结石首选治疗方法中的应用。
Asian J Urol. 2022 Apr;9(2):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Machine learning for outcome predictions of patients with trauma during emergency department care.机器学习在急诊科患者创伤预后预测中的应用。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100407.
3
Validation of a Visual-Based Analytics Tool for Outcome Prediction in Polytrauma Patients (WATSON Trauma Pathway Explorer) and Comparison with the Predictive Values of TRISS.
基于视觉的多创伤患者结局预测分析工具(沃森创伤路径浏览器)的验证及与TRISS预测值的比较
J Clin Med. 2021 May 14;10(10):2115. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102115.
4
Performance of injury severity measures in trauma research: a literature review and validation analysis of studies from low-income and middle-income countries.创伤研究中损伤严重程度测量的性能:来自低收入和中等收入国家的研究的文献回顾和验证分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):e023161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023161.
5
Influence of routine computed tomography on predicted survival from blunt thoracoabdominal trauma.常规计算机断层扫描对钝性胸腹联合伤预测生存的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Apr;37(2):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0042-9. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
6
Comparison of multiple prediction models for ambulation following spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后步行能力的多种预测模型比较
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:528-32.
7
Sequential use of neural networks for survival prediction in AIDS.在艾滋病中序贯使用神经网络进行生存预测。
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:170-4.