Suppr超能文献

评估Pharmacia衣原体酶免疫分析法用于诊断沙眼衣原体引起的生殖器感染。

Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

作者信息

Chan S W

机构信息

Virology Department, Westmead Hospital, NSW.

出版信息

Pathology. 1993 Jan;25(1):68-70. doi: 10.3109/00313029309068905.

Abstract

A new enzyme-immunoassay test (EIA), Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA, was evaluated in comparison with isolation in cell culture for the diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Endocervical and endourethral specimens were collected from 913 patients (875 female and 38 male patients respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values for this test were 89.4%, 99.2%, 85.8% and 99.4% respectively. Where discrepancies between the 2 techniques occurred, the remainder of the EIA buffer was stained for chlamydial antigen by direct immunofluorescence using the Syva Microtrak Chlamydia trachomatis Direct Specimen Test. Laboratory strains of various micro-organisms that may be present in genital specimens did not cross react with the EIA test except for Staphylococcus aureus and Group B Streptococcus at very high concentrations. The Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA is suitable for a laboratory which handles a large number of chlamydial specimens daily. However, when interpreting EIA results, the prevalence of chlamydial infection in the patient population should be established. At present, EIA tests are unsuitable as the only test for chlamydial diagnosis in low risk populations.

摘要

一种新的酶免疫测定试验(EIA),即Pharmacia衣原体EIA,与细胞培养分离法相比,用于评估沙眼衣原体引起的生殖器感染的诊断效果。从913名患者(分别为875名女性患者和38名男性患者)采集了宫颈内膜和尿道内标本。该试验的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为89.4%、99.2%、85.8%和99.4%。当两种技术出现差异时,使用Syva Microtrak沙眼衣原体直接标本试验通过直接免疫荧光对EIA缓冲液的剩余部分进行衣原体抗原染色。除了高浓度的金黄色葡萄球菌和B族链球菌外,生殖器标本中可能存在的各种微生物的实验室菌株与EIA试验均无交叉反应。Pharmacia衣原体EIA适用于每天处理大量衣原体标本的实验室。然而,在解释EIA结果时,应确定患者群体中衣原体感染的患病率。目前,EIA试验不适用于低风险人群中衣原体诊断的唯一检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验