Suppr超能文献

通过赛瓦直接荧光抗体试验对赛瓦微追踪沙眼衣原体酶免疫测定法进行确认。

Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.

作者信息

Beebe J L, Masters H, Jungkind D, Heltzel D M, Weinberg A

机构信息

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Nov-Dec;23(6):465-70. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199611000-00005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Syva Micro Trak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common.

GOALS

To evaluate the specificity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test.

STUDY DESIGN

Of 6,039 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado family planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by Syva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was tested by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negative by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking antibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three specimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens with Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. Coupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.

摘要

背景与目的

Syva Micro Trak酶免疫测定法(EIA)被广泛用于筛查沙眼衣原体感染的女性。与EIA筛查联合使用的确证试验表明,假阳性结果很常见。

目标

通过使用Syva直接荧光标本检测法确证阳性标本,评估Syva MicroTrak EIA的特异性。

研究设计

从科罗拉多州计划生育诊所就诊的女性中收集了6039份宫颈标本,通过Syva MicroTrak EIA获得了328份阳性EIA结果(5.4%)。对136份阳性标本的随机子集进行了Syva直接标本检测。对136份经Syva直接标本检测为阴性的标本中的20份(14.7%)也进行了Syva阻断抗体检测(20份中有9份阳性,45%)和罗氏Amplicor聚合酶链反应(PCR;20份中有6份阳性,30%)。在20份经Syva MicroTrak EIA检测为阳性但经Syva直接标本检测为阴性的标本中,11份(55%)经阻断抗体和PCR检测也为阴性,包括3份初始EIA样本与临界值之比大于2的标本。

结论

用Syva直接标本检测法对Syva MicroTrak EIA阳性标本进行确证检测显示,14.7%为假阳性。将Syva直接标本检测与阻断抗体或PCR联合使用可将假阳性结果率降低至8%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验