• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过赛瓦直接荧光抗体试验对赛瓦微追踪沙眼衣原体酶免疫测定法进行确认。

Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.

作者信息

Beebe J L, Masters H, Jungkind D, Heltzel D M, Weinberg A

机构信息

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Nov-Dec;23(6):465-70. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199611000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00007435-199611000-00005
PMID:8946630
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Syva Micro Trak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common.

GOALS

To evaluate the specificity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test.

STUDY DESIGN

Of 6,039 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado family planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by Syva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was tested by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negative by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking antibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three specimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens with Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. Coupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.

摘要

背景与目的

Syva Micro Trak酶免疫测定法(EIA)被广泛用于筛查沙眼衣原体感染的女性。与EIA筛查联合使用的确证试验表明,假阳性结果很常见。

目标

通过使用Syva直接荧光标本检测法确证阳性标本,评估Syva MicroTrak EIA的特异性。

研究设计

从科罗拉多州计划生育诊所就诊的女性中收集了6039份宫颈标本,通过Syva MicroTrak EIA获得了328份阳性EIA结果(5.4%)。对136份阳性标本的随机子集进行了Syva直接标本检测。对136份经Syva直接标本检测为阴性的标本中的20份(14.7%)也进行了Syva阻断抗体检测(20份中有9份阳性,45%)和罗氏Amplicor聚合酶链反应(PCR;20份中有6份阳性,30%)。在20份经Syva MicroTrak EIA检测为阳性但经Syva直接标本检测为阴性的标本中,11份(55%)经阻断抗体和PCR检测也为阴性,包括3份初始EIA样本与临界值之比大于2的标本。

结论

用Syva直接标本检测法对Syva MicroTrak EIA阳性标本进行确证检测显示,14.7%为假阳性。将Syva直接标本检测与阻断抗体或PCR联合使用可将假阳性结果率降低至8%。

相似文献

1
Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.通过赛瓦直接荧光抗体试验对赛瓦微追踪沙眼衣原体酶免疫测定法进行确认。
Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Nov-Dec;23(6):465-70. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199611000-00005.
2
Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和直接免疫荧光显微镜检查来确认由Syva MicroTrak衣原体酶免疫测定法获得的结果。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2620-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2620-2623.1995.
3
A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.在一家大型实验室中,采用直接荧光抗体检测法进行选择性确证,对Syva MicroTrak衣原体酶免疫测定法进行为期1年的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2208-11. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2208-2211.1994.
4
Confirmatory testing of Chlamydia trachomatis Syva enzyme immunoassay gray zone specimens by Syva direct fluorescent antibody test.
Sex Transm Dis. 1993 May-Jun;20(3):140-2. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199305000-00004.
5
Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.将五种衣原体检测方法与质量保证的培养标准进行直接比较评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Mar;37(3):681-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.681-685.1999.
6
Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.在衣原体感染率高的女性人群中,比较Syva MicroTrak酶免疫测定法、Gen-Probe PACE 2与细胞培养法用于诊断宫颈沙眼衣原体感染的效果。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):968-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.968-971.1993.
7
Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.评估Syva酶免疫分析法用于检测生殖道标本中的沙眼衣原体。
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1541-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1541-1544.1990.
8
Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.Syva Microtrak酶免疫测定法与雅培衣原体酶免疫测定法在检测女性衣原体感染中的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Feb;119(2):153-6.
9
Comparison of an automated enzyme immunoassay with a direct fluorescent antibody test and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in diagnostic specimens from male patients.在男性患者诊断标本中,将自动化酶免疫测定法与直接荧光抗体试验及聚合酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体的比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Apr;15(4):336-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01695668.
10
Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.评估Pharmacia衣原体酶免疫分析法用于诊断沙眼衣原体引起的生殖器感染。
Pathology. 1993 Jan;25(1):68-70. doi: 10.3109/00313029309068905.