• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘画行为中的肢体节段选择

Limb-segment selection in drawing behaviour.

作者信息

Meulenbroek R G, Rosenbaum D A, Thomassen A J, Schomaker L R

机构信息

Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):273-99. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401047.

DOI:10.1080/14640749308401047
PMID:8316638
Abstract

How do we select combinations of limb segments to carry out physical tasks? Three possible determinants of limb-segment selection are hypothesized here: (1) optimal amplitudes and frequencies of motion for the effectors; (2) preferred movement axes for the effectors; and (3) a tendency to continue using already-recruited limb-segments. We tested these factors in a graphic production task. Seven subjects produced back-and-forth drawing movements of gradually changing amplitude. The largest amplitude to be covered, trial duration, movement axis, and direction of amplitude change (from small to large or vice versa) were varied between trials. Selspot recordings were used to study the relative contributions of the fingers, hand, and arm to displacements of the pen. The temporal order of limb-segment involvement was also studied. The results confirmed the predicted effects of the three limb-segment selection factors. We conclude that limb-segment coordination is adaptively related to biomechanical features of the motor system and to the computational demands of movement selection itself.

摘要

我们如何选择肢体节段的组合来执行身体任务?本文提出了三个可能决定肢体节段选择的因素:(1)效应器运动的最佳幅度和频率;(2)效应器偏好的运动轴;(3)持续使用已被激活的肢体节段的倾向。我们在一项图形绘制任务中对这些因素进行了测试。七名受试者进行了幅度逐渐变化的来回绘图运动。每次试验中,要覆盖的最大幅度、试验持续时间、运动轴以及幅度变化方向(从小变大或反之)均有所不同。使用Selspot记录来研究手指、手部和手臂对笔位移的相对贡献。同时还研究了肢体节段参与的时间顺序。结果证实了这三个肢体节段选择因素的预期效果。我们得出结论,肢体节段协调与运动系统的生物力学特征以及运动选择本身的计算需求具有适应性关联。

相似文献

1
Limb-segment selection in drawing behaviour.绘画行为中的肢体节段选择
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):273-99. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401047.
2
Influence of age and movement complexity on kinematic hand movement parameters in childhood and adolescence.年龄和运动复杂性对儿童及青少年手部运动学参数的影响。
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2008 Nov;26(7):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
3
Arm position constraints when throwing in three dimensions.三维投掷时的手臂位置限制
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Sep;72(3):1171-80. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.3.1171.
4
Limb Segment Recruitment as Function of Movement Direction, Amplitude, and Speed.
J Mot Behav. 1996 Sep;28(3):241-254. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1996.9941749.
5
Biomechanical and perceptual determinants of drawing angles.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1996 Dec;94(3):253-71. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(96)00004-2.
6
Perceptual-motor exploration as a function of biomechanical and task constraints.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1995 Mar;88(2):127-65. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)e0056-8.
7
Interjoint coordination during handwriting-like movements.类书写运动中的关节间协调。
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Nov;135(1):127-40. doi: 10.1007/s002210000495.
8
Relative phase destabilization during interlimb coordination: the disruptive role of kinesthetic afferences induced by passive movement.双侧肢体协调过程中的相对相位失稳:被动运动诱发的本体感觉传入的干扰作用。
Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(3):439-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00233044.
9
Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks.两项图形任务中实际运动时间与心理运动时间的对比分析。
Brain Cogn. 1989 Sep;11(1):87-97. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90007-9.
10
Exploitation of elasticity as a biomechanical property in the production of graphic stroke sequences.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Mar;82(1-3):313-27. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90018-m.

引用本文的文献

1
Getting stuck in a rut as an emergent feature of a dynamic decision-making system.陷入常规作为动态决策系统的一种突发特征。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 3;11(4):231550. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231550. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Is Language Production Planning Emergent From Action Planning? A Preliminary Investigation.语言产出规划是否源自行动规划?一项初步调查。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01193. eCollection 2020.
3
Now and then: Hand choice is influenced by recent action history.时而:手部选择受到近期动作历史的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):305-314. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1.
4
Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs.抓握动作的神经生理学:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 22;7:1996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01996. eCollection 2016.
5
Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.在顺序抓握和指向任务中,任务关键关节不存在运动滞后现象。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4831-1. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.姿势选择的运动计划不会在双手之间转移。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 11;6:1358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01358. eCollection 2015.
7
Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.机械负荷对序贯效应的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;228(4):445-55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3576-3. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
8
Distinct Inter-Joint Coordination during Fast Alternate Keystrokes in Pianists with Superior Skill.技艺高超的钢琴家在快速交替击键过程中独特的关节间协调。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 May 27;5:50. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00050. eCollection 2011.
9
Coordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks.全身伸展任务中脊柱和髋关节的协调与时机
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Feb;26(1):124-40. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
10
The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.内部模型与主导关节假说:对多关节运动控制的启示
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2339-1. Epub 2005 Aug 13.