Doyle E, McFadzean W, Morton N S
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow.
Br J Anaesth. 1993 May;70(5):542-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/70.5.542.
We studied 40 children undergoing general surgical procedures. They were allocated randomly to receive induction of anaesthesia with propofol 3-5 mg kg-1 followed by maintenance with halothane and an appropriate regional block, or induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with a computerized, target-controlled infusion of propofol with a regional block. All patients breathed a mixture of 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen via a laryngeal mask airway. Both techniques provided adequate anaesthesia and operating conditions. There were no significant differences between the groups in heart rate, mean arterial pressure and end-expired carbon dioxide concentration during anaesthesia. There was no significant difference in the recovery times of the two groups.
我们研究了40名接受普通外科手术的儿童。他们被随机分配,一组接受丙泊酚3 - 5毫克/千克诱导麻醉,随后用氟烷维持麻醉并辅以适当的区域阻滞;另一组通过计算机控制的丙泊酚靶控输注并辅以区域阻滞进行麻醉诱导和维持。所有患者均通过喉罩气道吸入含67%氧化亚氮的氧气混合气体。两种技术均提供了充分的麻醉和手术条件。麻醉期间两组的心率、平均动脉压和呼气末二氧化碳浓度无显著差异。两组的恢复时间也无显著差异。