Grabitz H J, Hammerl M
Dept. of Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1993 Apr-Jun;28(2):182-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02691225.
Schwartz (1982, 1988) found that a pretraining of contingent reinforcement interferes with subsequent rule discovery. The present study investigated the effects of schedule imposed sequential and quantitative constraints (Timberlake & Allison, 1974) on task performance in a subsequent test phase. Sixty-four Ss, students of the University of Duesseldorf, were assigned at random to one of four experimental conditions, differing according to the presence vs. absence of sequential and quantitative constraints, respectively. Discrimination-learning performance and variability during test phase were significantly better for Ss experiencing sequential constraint during treatment. In contrast, the introduction of a quantitative restriction during treatment had no statistically significant effects on test phase performance.
施瓦茨(1982年、1988年)发现,偶然性强化的预训练会干扰随后的规则发现。本研究调查了时间表施加的顺序和数量限制(廷伯莱克和艾利森,1974年)对后续测试阶段任务表现的影响。六十四名受试者,即杜塞尔多夫大学的学生,被随机分配到四个实验条件之一,这四个条件分别根据是否存在顺序和数量限制而有所不同。在治疗期间经历顺序限制的受试者在测试阶段的辨别学习表现和变异性明显更好。相比之下,在治疗期间引入数量限制对测试阶段表现没有统计学上的显著影响。