White H S
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Jan;65(1):6-12.
This paper examines changes in the management of university, special, and medical libraries brought about by the budget curtailments that followed the more affluent funding period of the mid-1960s. Based on a study conducted for the National Science Foundation by the Indiana University Graduate Library School, this paper deals with misconceptions that have arisen in the relationship between publishers and librarians, and differentiates between the priority perceptions of academic and of special librarians in the allocation of progressively scarcer resources. It concludes that libraries must make strong efforts to reduce the growing erosion of materials acquisitions budgets because of growing labor costs as a percentage of all library expenditures; that they must make a working reality of the resource-sharing mechanisms established through consortia and networks; and that they must use advanced evaluative techniques in the determination of which services and programs to implement, expand, and retain, and which to curtail and abandon.
本文探讨了20世纪60年代中期资金较为充裕之后预算削减所带来的大学图书馆、专业图书馆和医学图书馆管理方面的变化。基于印第安纳大学研究生图书馆学院为美国国家科学基金会开展的一项研究,本文论述了出版商与图书馆员关系中出现的误解,并区分了学术图书馆员和专业图书馆员在分配日益稀缺的资源时的优先认知。结论是,图书馆必须大力努力,减少因劳动力成本在图书馆所有支出中所占比例不断上升而导致的材料采购预算日益缩减的情况;必须使通过联盟和网络建立的资源共享机制成为现实;并且必须运用先进的评估技术来确定实施、扩大和保留哪些服务及项目,以及削减和放弃哪些服务及项目。