Cummins R O
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:313-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.001525.
Early access to the EMS system helps insure early CPR, defibrillation, and advanced care. Early access is easiest to achieve with 911 systems and widespread community education and publicity. It may also be taught during citizen-CPR classes. Early CPR helps patients by slowing the process of dying, but its effectiveness disappears within minutes, and defibrillation must soon follow. A citizenry well-informed about cardiac emergencies and well-trained in CPR appears to be the best method to achieve early recognition and early CPR. The earliest possible delivery of defibrillation is critical and, almost by itself, sufficient for many sudden death cases. It has, therefore, emerged as the single most effective intervention for patients in nontraumatic cardiac arrest. Automated external defibrillators help accomplish this goal and now permit widespread implementation of a variety of early defibrillation programs. Early advanced care helps those who do not immediately convert to an organized cardiac activity or who do not achieve a spontaneous circulation following early defibrillation. Advanced care allows a system to approach its highest possible survival rate by respiratory and anti-arrhythmic stabilization and monitoring of patients in the post-resuscitation period. At present, early CPR and rapid defibrillation, combined with early advanced care, can result in long-term survival rates as high as 30% for witnessed VF. Because neurological and psychological recovery from cardiac arrest are tied to the time within which these critical interdependent treatment modalities are delivered (1, 87), high resuscitation rates will also lead to a high percentage of patients who recover to their pre-arrest neurologic level. The public health challenge is to develop programs that will allow recognition, access, bystander-CPR, defibrillation, and advanced care to be delivered as quickly as possible, ideally within moments of the collapse of a sudden death victim. Achievement of such a goal requires the deployment of multiple properly directed programs within an EMS system; each program lends strength to the chain of survival, thereby enhancing successful recovery and long-term survival. What benefits would occur if a majority of EMS systems in the United States could establish cost-effective programs with respectable survival rates? The AHA estimates that full implementation of potential life-saving mechanisms in the community may save 10,000-100,000 lives each year in the US (2). If the maximum survival rate for all nontraumatic cardiac arrests in mature EMS systems is about 20% (33) among the annual 400,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 80,000 persons would be saved (33).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
尽早接入急救医疗服务(EMS)系统有助于确保尽早进行心肺复苏(CPR)、除颤和高级护理。通过911系统以及广泛的社区教育和宣传,最容易实现尽早接入。在市民心肺复苏课程中也可以传授相关知识。尽早进行心肺复苏可减缓患者死亡进程,但数分钟后其效果就会消失,必须尽快进行除颤。让民众充分了解心脏急症并接受良好的心肺复苏培训,似乎是实现早期识别和尽早进行心肺复苏的最佳方法。尽早进行除颤至关重要,而且对许多猝死病例而言,几乎仅凭这一点就足够了。因此,它已成为非创伤性心脏骤停患者最有效的单一干预措施。自动体外除颤器有助于实现这一目标,现在使得各种早期除颤计划得以广泛实施。尽早进行高级护理有助于那些未能立即恢复有组织的心脏活动或在早期除颤后未实现自主循环的患者。高级护理可通过呼吸和抗心律失常稳定以及对复苏后患者的监测,使急救系统达到尽可能高的生存率。目前,尽早进行心肺复苏和快速除颤,再加上尽早进行高级护理,对于目击的室颤患者,长期生存率可高达30%。由于心脏骤停后的神经和心理恢复与这些关键的相互依存治疗方式的实施时间相关(1, 87),高复苏率也将导致很大比例的患者恢复到心脏骤停前的神经水平。公共卫生面临的挑战是制定相关计划,以便能够尽快实现识别、接入、旁观者心肺复苏、除颤和高级护理,理想情况是在猝死患者倒地后的短时间内。要实现这一目标,需要在急救医疗服务系统内部署多个方向正确的计划;每个计划都为生存链增添力量,从而提高成功复苏和长期生存的几率。如果美国大多数急救医疗服务系统能够建立具有可观生存率且成本效益高的计划,会带来哪些益处呢?美国心脏协会估计,在社区全面实施潜在的救生机制每年可能在美国挽救10,000 - 100,000条生命(2)。在每年400,000例院外心脏骤停病例中,如果成熟急救医疗服务系统中所有非创伤性心脏骤停的最高生存率约为20%(33),那么将有80,000人获救(33)。(摘要截取自400字)