Accu-CulShure系统与置于B-D Port-a-Cul管中的拭子用于标本采集和运输的比较。
Comparison of the Accu-CulShure system and a swab placed in a B-D Port-a-Cul tube for specimen collection and transport.
作者信息
Baron E J, Väisänen M L, McTeague M, Strong C A, Norman D, Finegold S M
机构信息
Research Division, VA Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90073.
出版信息
Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jun;16 Suppl 4:S325-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_4.s325.
We compared the Accu-CulShure guarded specimen collection device and a swab inserted into a B-D Port-a-Cul transport tube in terms of their efficacy under ideal conditions for recovery of bacteria from 10 decubitus ulcer specimens. Cultures yielded 57 aerobes and 21 anaerobes; 76 isolates were recovered with use of Accu-CulShure, and 72 isolates were recovered with use of Port-a-Cul. Both systems were comparable for recovery of organisms in terms of quantitative and qualitative results.
我们比较了Accu-CulShure带保护装置的标本采集器和插入B-D Port-a-Cul转运管中的拭子，在从10份褥疮溃疡标本中回收细菌的理想条件下的效果。培养物产生了57种需氧菌和21种厌氧菌；使用Accu-CulShure回收了76株分离菌，使用Port-a-Cul回收了72株分离菌。在定量和定性结果方面，两种系统在回收微生物方面具有可比性。
Zotero 插件